» Articles » PMID: 37342513

The Biosafety Research Road Map: The Search for Evidence to Support Practices in the Laboratory- and

Abstract

Introduction: and are zoonoses transmitted from animals and animal products. Scientific information is provided in this article to support biosafety precautions necessary to protect laboratory workers and individuals who are potentially exposed to these pathogens in the workplace or other settings, and gaps in information are also reported. There is a lack of information on the appropriate effective concentration for many chemical disinfectants for this agent. Controversies related to include infectious dose for skin and gastrointestinal infections, proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) during the slaughter of infected animals, and handling of contaminated materials. is reported to have the highest number of laboratory-acquired infections (LAIs) to date in laboratory workers.

Methods: A literature search was conducted to identify potential gaps in biosafety and focused on five main sections including the route of inoculation/modes of transmission, infectious dose, LAIs, containment releases, and disinfection and decontamination strategies.

Results: Scientific literature currently lacks information on the effective concentration of many chemical disinfectants for this agent and in the variety of matrices where it may be found. Controversies related to include infectious dose for skin and gastrointestinal infections, proper use of PPE during the slaughter of infected animals, and handling contaminated materials.

Discussion: Clarified vulnerabilities based on specific scientific evidence will contribute to the prevention of unwanted and unpredictable infections, improving the biosafety processes and procedures for laboratory staff and other professionals such as veterinarians, individuals associated with the agricultural industry, and those working with susceptible wildlife species.

Citing Articles

Establishment of a 23S rRNA assay for Brucella and its application in evaluating bacterial growth status.

Wang H, Yang H, Yang J, Liu X, Xie B, Xu M Vet Res Commun. 2025; 49(2):110.

PMID: 39982617 DOI: 10.1007/s11259-025-10676-1.

References
1.
PUNSKII E, ZHEGLOVA D . [Role of camels in epidemiology of anthrax]. Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol. 1958; 29(2):78-82. View

2.
Spotts Whitney E, Beatty M, Taylor Jr T, Weyant R, Sobel J, Arduino M . Inactivation of Bacillus anthracis spores. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003; 9(6):623-7. PMC: 3000133. View

3.
Kolton C, Marston C, Stoddard R, Cossaboom C, Salzer J, Kozel T . Detection of Bacillus anthracis in animal tissues using InBios active anthrax detect rapid test lateral flow immunoassay. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2019; 68(6):480-484. PMC: 6548312. DOI: 10.1111/lam.13134. View

4.
Dettwiler M, Mehinagic K, Gobeli Brawand S, Thomann A, Feyer S, Husser L . Bacillus anthracis as a cause of bovine abortion - a necropsy case requiring special biosafety measures. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. 2018; 160(9):547-552. DOI: 10.17236/sat00176. View

5.
Siengsanan-Lamont J, Blacksell S . A Review of Laboratory-Acquired Infections in the Asia-Pacific: Understanding Risk and the Need for Improved Biosafety for Veterinary and Zoonotic Diseases. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2018; 3(2). PMC: 6073996. DOI: 10.3390/tropicalmed3020036. View