» Articles » PMID: 37341755

Clinical Characteristics of Visual Motion Hypersensitivity: a Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2023 Jun 21
PMID 37341755
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This qualitative systematic review presents an overview of the state of the research relating to visual motion hypersensitivity (VMH) and offers a reference tool for future studies in the field. The study set out to identify and collate articles investigating risk groups with aberrant responses to visual motion as compared to healthy control groups, presenting evidence for risk factors associated with visual motion hypersensitivity. Data were synthesized into the state of the research and analyzed in the context of the clinical characteristics of each risk factor. Literature searches were performed on Medline Ovid, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cinahl, identifying a total of 586 studies of which 54 were finally included. Original articles published between the dates of commencement for each database and 19th January 2021 were included. JBI critical appraisal tools were implemented for each corresponding article type. In total, the following number of studies was identified for each respective risk factor: age (n = 6), migraines (n = 8), concussions (n = 8), vestibular disorders (n = 13), psychiatric conditions (n = 5), and Parkinson's disease (n = 5). Several studies described VMH as the primary concern (n = 6), though these primarily included patients with vestibulopathies. There were considerable differences in the nomenclature employed to describe VMH, depending largely on the investigating group. An overview of investigated risk factors and their evaluation methods was presented in a Sankey diagram. Posturography was the most implemented methodology but due to diverse measurements meta-analyses were not possible. One may however note that while the easily implemented Vestibular Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) was designed for concussed patients, it may prove useful for other risk groups.

Citing Articles

A Proposed Mechanism for Visual Vertigo: Post-Concussion Patients Have Higher Gain From Visual Input Into Subcortical Gaze Stabilization.

Frattini D, Rosen N, Wibble T Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024; 65(4):26.

PMID: 38607620 PMC: 11018265. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.65.4.26.


Investigating cortical activity during cybersickness by fNIRS.

Yeo S, Park S, Yun S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):8093.

PMID: 38582769 PMC: 10998856. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58715-2.


Visual motion hypersensitivity, from spaceflight to Parkinson's disease-as the chiasmatic cistern may be impacted by microgravity together with normal terrestrial gravity-opposition physiology in the brain.

Jaster J, Ong J, Ottaviani G Exp Brain Res. 2024; 242(3):521-523.

PMID: 38252144 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06780-4.

References
1.
Shuffrey L, Levinson L, Becerra A, Pak G, Sepulveda D, Montgomery A . Visually Evoked Response Differences to Contrast and Motion in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Brain Sci. 2018; 8(9). PMC: 6162529. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci8090160. View

2.
Schubert M, Prokop T, Brocke F, Berger W . Visual kinesthesia and locomotion in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2004; 20(2):141-50. DOI: 10.1002/mds.20281. View

3.
Bles W, Vianney de Jong J, de Wit G . Compensation for labyrinthine defects examined by use of a tilting room. Acta Otolaryngol. 1983; 95(5-6):576-9. DOI: 10.3109/00016488309139445. View

4.
Agarwal K, Bronstein A, Faldon M, Mandala M, Murray K, Silove Y . Visual dependence and BPPV. J Neurol. 2011; 259(6):1117-24. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-011-6311-7. View

5.
Wildenberg J, Tyler M, Danilov Y, Kaczmarek K, Meyerand M . Electrical tongue stimulation normalizes activity within the motion-sensitive brain network in balance-impaired subjects as revealed by group independent component analysis. Brain Connect. 2012; 1(3):255-65. PMC: 3621307. DOI: 10.1089/brain.2011.0029. View