» Articles » PMID: 37337609

Bibliometric Analysis on Global Analgesia in Labor from 2002 to 2021

Overview
Journal J Pain Res
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Date 2023 Jun 20
PMID 37337609
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Maternal pain during labor is one of the most important factors contributing to increased cesarean delivery rates and poor pregnancy outcomes, and this pain can be managed by labor analgesia. Many studies exist on labor analgesia, and the quantity and quality of these studies have not been reported. Therefore, we aimed to perform a bibliometric analysis of studies from 2002 to 2021.

Methods: We used the Web of Science database to obtain publications related to labor analgesia from January 2002 to December 2021. Various bibliographic information was collected, including country; author; journal; grant; discipline; institution and research hotspot. A total of 4536 papers were included.

Results: A total of 4536 articles were included in the study. The country with the most published articles on labor analgesia and the country of the funding agency was the United States. Most articles were published in the disciplines Anesthesiology and Obstetrics & Gynecology. The journal that published the most articles in this category was International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. In addition, we found different research hotspots for labor analgesia in the United States, Japan, and China.

Conclusion: This paper provides a bibliometric analysis of research on labor analgesia and highlights the differences in research hotspots for labor analgesia between countries.

Citing Articles

Global research trends in labor analgesia: A bibliometric analysis from 2013 to 2023.

Xiao Y, Tao Y, Hu Y, Liao Z Heliyon. 2024; 10(17):e36960.

PMID: 39281528 PMC: 11402232. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36960.


Bibliometric analysis of research on spinal cord and sacral neuromodulation in spinal cord injury.

Ye J, Chen J, Wang J, Ren J, Jia Y, Xia Z Spinal Cord. 2024; 62(11):634-641.

PMID: 39251809 DOI: 10.1038/s41393-024-01029-x.

References
1.
Kan R, Hughes S, Rosen M, Kessin C, Preston P, Lobo E . Intravenous remifentanil: placental transfer, maternal and neonatal effects. Anesthesiology. 1998; 88(6):1467-74. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199806000-00008. View

2.
Zhao Y, Xin Y, Liu Y, Yi X, Liu Y . Effect of Epidural Dexmedetomidine Combined With Ropivacaine in Labor Analgesia: A Randomized Double-Blinded Controlled Study. Clin J Pain. 2016; 33(4):319-324. DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000411. View

3.
Dinges H, Otto S, Stay D, Baumlein S, Waldmann S, Kranke P . Side Effect Rates of Opioids in Equianalgesic Doses via Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2018; 129(4):1153-1162. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003887. View

4.
Thurlow J, Waterhouse P . Patient-controlled analgesia in labour using remifentanil in two parturients with platelet abnormalities. Br J Anaesth. 2000; 84(3):411-3. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013452. View

5.
Missant C, Teunkenst A, Vandermeersch E, Van de Velde M . Patient-controlled epidural analgesia following combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labour: the effects of adding a continuous epidural infusion. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2005; 33(4):452-6. DOI: 10.1177/0310057X0503300405. View