Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Commercially Available Cannabidiol Isolate, Broad-Spectrum, and Full-Spectrum Products
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background And Objectives: A wide variety of products containing cannabidiol (CBD) are available on the commercial market. One of the most common products, CBD oil, is administered to self-treat a variety of conditions. These oils are available as CBD isolate, broad-spectrum [all terpenes and minor cannabinoids except Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)], or full-spectrum (all terpenes and minor cannabinoids with THC < 0.3% dried weight) products. A systematic pharmacokinetic study was performed to determine whether there are differences in the pharmacokinetic parameters and systemic exposure of CBD after oral dosing as an isolate, broad-spectrum, or full-spectrum product.
Methods: Male and female Sprague Dawley rats were treated with a single, equivalent oral dose of CBD delivered as isolate, broad-spectrum, or full-spectrum product. An additional study using an in-house preparation of CBD isolate plus 0.2% THC was performed. A permeability assay was also conducted to investigate whether the presence of THC alters the intestinal permeability of CBD.
Results: There was an increase in the oral bioavailability of CBD (12% and 21% in male and female rats, respectively) when administered as a full-spectrum product compared with the isolate and broad-spectrum products. There was no difference in the bioavailability of CBD between the commercially available full-spectrum formulation (3.1% CBD; containing 0.2% THC plus terpenes and other minor cannabinoids) versus the in-house preparation of CBD full-spectrum (CBD isolate 3.2% plus 0.2% THC isolate). In vitro permeability assays demonstrated that the presence of THC increases permeability of CBD while also decreasing efflux through the gut wall.
Conclusions: The presence of 0.2% THC increased the oral bioavailability of CBD in male and female rats, indicating that full-spectrum products may produce increased effectiveness of CBD due to a greater exposure available systemically.
Genotoxicity study of L. extract.
Costa A, Gasparotto Jr A, Pereira C, Lourenco E, Garcia A, Joaquim H Toxicol Rep. 2025; 14():101864.
PMID: 39816045 PMC: 11733056. DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2024.101864.
Sagar K, Gruber S CNS Drugs. 2025; 39(2):113-125.
PMID: 39753766 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-024-01148-2.
Di Salvo A, Chiaradia E, Sforna M, Rocca G Vet Res Commun. 2024; 48(5):2915-2941.
PMID: 39162768 PMC: 11442603. DOI: 10.1007/s11259-024-10509-7.
Urrutia-Ortega I, Valencia I, Ispanixtlahuatl-Meraz O, Benitez-Flores J, Espinosa-Gonzalez A, Estrella-Parra E Photochem Photobiol. 2024; 101(1):83-105.
PMID: 38958000 PMC: 11737019. DOI: 10.1111/php.13993.
Gidal B, Vandrey R, Wallin C, Callan S, Sutton A, Saurer T Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1335441.
PMID: 38562466 PMC: 10982813. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1335441.