» Articles » PMID: 37336840

Robotic-assisted Colectomy in Children: a Comparative Study with Laparoscopic Surgery

Overview
Journal J Robot Surg
Publisher Springer
Date 2023 Jun 19
PMID 37336840
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted colectomy in children. All children who underwent a colectomy with a laparoscopic (LapC) or robotic-assisted (RobC) approach in our institution (January 2010-March 2023) were included. Demographics, surgical data, and post-operative outcomes within 30 days were collected. Additional cost related to the robotic approach was calculated. Comparisons were performed using Fisher tests for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney tests for continuous variables. A total of 55 colectomies were performed: 31 LapC and 24 RobC (median age: 14.9 years). Main indications included: inflammatory bowel disease (n = 36, 65%), familial adenomatous polyposis (n = 6, 11%), sigmoid volvulus (n = 5, 9%), chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (n = 3, 5%). LapC included 22 right, 4 left, and 5 total colectomies. RobC included 15 right, 4 left, and 5 total colectomies. Robotic-assisted surgery was associated with increased operative time (3 h vs 2.5 h, p = 0.02), with a median increase in operative time of 36 min. There were no conversions. Post-operative complications occurred in 35% of LapC and 38% of RobC (p = 0.99). Complications requiring treatment under general anesthesia (Clavien-Dindo 3) occurred in similar rates (23% in LapC vs 13% in RobC, p = 0.49). Length of hospitalization was 10 days in LapC and 8.5 days in RobC (p = 0.39). The robotic approach was associated with a median additional cost of 2156€ per surgery. Robotic-assisted colectomy is as safe and feasible as laparoscopic colectomy in children, with similar complication rates but increased operative times and cost.

Citing Articles

Robotic versus laparoscopic approaches for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of postoperative complications, anastomotic leak, and mortality.

Asmat M, Caballero-Alvarado J, Lozano-Peralta K, Marinas H, Zavaleta-Corvera C Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024; 409(1):353.

PMID: 39576363 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03545-z.


Laparoscopic Sigmoid Colectomy with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction in Sigmoid Volvulus.

Atamanalp S Eurasian J Med. 2024; .

PMID: 38798007 PMC: 11332260. DOI: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2024.24420.


Comments on 'Robotic-assisted colectomy in children: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery'.

Atamanalp S J Robot Surg. 2023; 17(5):2561-2562.

PMID: 37439903 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01675-y.

References
1.
Sorensen M, Johnson M, Delostrinos C, Bice J, Grady R, Lendvay T . Initiation of a pediatric robotic surgery program: institutional challenges and realistic outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2010; 24(11):2803-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1052-8. View

2.
Meehan J, Sandler A . Pediatric robotic surgery: A single-institutional review of the first 100 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc. 2007; 22(1):177-82. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9418-2. View

3.
Weber P, Merola S, Wasielewski A, Ballantyne G . Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002; 45(12):1689-94; discussion 1695-6. DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-7261-2. View

4.
Davis B, Yoo A, Moore M, Gunnarsson C . Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic colectomy: cost and clinical outcomes. JSLS. 2014; 18(2):211-24. PMC: 4035631. DOI: 10.4293/108680813X13753907291035. View

5.
Deutsch G, Anantha Sathyanarayana S, Gunabushanam V, Mishra N, Rubach E, Zemon H . Robotic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: an institutional experience. Surg Endosc. 2011; 26(4):956-63. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1977-6. View