» Articles » PMID: 37336782

Surgical Outcome of Extrahepatic Portal Venous Obstruction: Audit from a Tertiary Referral Centre in Eastern India

Overview
Date 2023 Jun 19
PMID 37336782
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Backgrounds/aims: Extra hepatic portal venous obstruction (EHPVO) is the most common cause of portal hypertension in Indian children. While endoscopy is the primary modality of management, a subset of patients require surgery. This study aims to report the short- and long-term outcomes of EHPVO patients managed surgically.

Methods: All the patients with EHPVO who underwent surgery between August 2007 and December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative complications were classified after Clavien-Dindo. Binary logistic regression in Wald methodology was used to determine the predictive factors responsible for unfavourable outcome.

Results: Total of 202 patients with EHPVO were operated. Mean age of patients was 20.30 ± 9.96 years, and duration of illness, 90.05 ± 75.13 months. Most common indication for surgery was portal biliopathy (n = 59, 29.2%), followed by bleeding (n = 50, 24.8%). Total of 166 patients (82.2%) had shunt procedure. Splenectomy with esophagogastric devascularization was the second most common surgery (n = 20, 9.9%). Nine major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo > 3) were observed in 8 patients (4.0%), including 1 (0.5%) operative death. After a median follow-up of 56 months (15-156 months), 166 patients (82.2%) had favourable outcome. In multivariate analysis, associated splenic artery aneurysm ( = 0.007), isolated gastric varices ( = 0.004), preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and stenting ( = 0.015), and shunt occlusion ( < 0.001) were independent predictors of unfavourable long-term outcome.

Conclusions: Surgery in EHPVO is safe, affords excellent short- and long-term outcome in patients with symptomatic EHPVO, and may be considered for secondary prophylaxis.

Citing Articles

Comparison of surgical outcomes between shunt surgery and devascularization in non-cirrhotic portal hypertension.

Anwar S, Parasar K, Anand U, Singh B, Kant K, Kodali R Turk J Surg. 2025; 40(3):229-239.

PMID: 39917409 PMC: 11792894. DOI: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6525.

References
1.
Sharma B, Varakanahalli S, Singh J, Srivastava S . Gastric Varices in Cirrhosis vs. Extrahepatic Portal Venous Obstruction and Response to Endoscopic -butyl-2-cyanoacrylate Injection. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2017; 7(2):97-101. PMC: 5478943. DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2016.09.002. View

2.
Bhatia V . Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in portal cavernoma cholangiopathy - results from different studies and proposal for uniform terminology. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015; 4(Suppl 1):S37-43. PMC: 4244821. DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2013.05.013. View

3.
Rangari M, Gupta R, Jain M, Malhotra V, Sarin S . Hepatic dysfunction in patients with extrahepatic portal venous obstruction. Liver Int. 2004; 23(6):434-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2003.00879.x. View

4.
McDermott V, Shlansky-Goldberg R, Cope C . Endovascular management of splenic artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1994; 17(4):179-84. DOI: 10.1007/BF00571531. View

5.
Emre S, Dugan C, Frankenberg T, Hudgins L, Gagliardi R, Artis A . Surgical portosystemic shunts and the Rex bypass in children: a single-centre experience. HPB (Oxford). 2009; 11(3):252-7. PMC: 2697896. DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00047.x. View