» Articles » PMID: 37334654

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients with Extra-small Aortic Annuli

Abstract

Background: A small aortic annulus (SAA) is a risk factor for prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) in patients undergoing surgical or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Data regarding TAVI in patients with extra-SAA are scarce.

Aims: The aim of this study was to analyse the safety and efficacy of TAVI in patients with extra-SAA.

Methods: A multicentre registry study including patients with extra-SAA (defined as an aortic annulus area <280 mm and/or perimeter <60 mm) undergoing TAVI was established. Primary efficacy and safety endpoints were defined as device success and early safety at 30 days, respectively, using the Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 criteria, and were analysed according to valve type: self-expanding (SEV) versus balloon-expandable (BEV).

Results: A total of 150 patients were included, of which 139 (92.7%) were women, and 110 (73.3%) received an SEV. Intraprocedural technical success was 91.3%, with a higher rate in patients receiving an SEV (96.4% vs 77.5% with BEV; p=0.001). Overall, 30-day device success was 81.3%, (85.5% with SEV vs 70.0% with BEV; p=0.032). The primary safety endpoint occurred in 72.0% of patients (with no difference between groups; p=0.118). Severe PPM occurred in 12% (9.0% with SEV and 24.0% with BEV; p=0.039), with no impact on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, or heart failure readmission at 2-year follow-up.

Conclusions: TAVI is a safe and feasible treatment in patients with extra-SAA with a high rate of technical success. The use of SEV was associated with a lower rate of intraprocedural complications, higher device success at 30 days and better haemodynamic outcomes compared to BEV.

Citing Articles

Supra-Annular Versus Intra-Annular Self-Expanding Valves in Small Aortic Annulus: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.

Sa M, Ahmad D, Wang Y, Thoma F, Makani A, Kliner D Struct Heart. 2025; 9(1):100334.

PMID: 40017835 PMC: 11864141. DOI: 10.1016/j.shj.2024.100334.


Navitor™ in Evolut™: a case report illustrating a novel approach to redo-transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Volz S, Petursson P, Ioanes D, Ramunddal T, Angeras O Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2024; 8(11):ytae577.

PMID: 39525513 PMC: 11544423. DOI: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytae577.


Short and Long-Term Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in the Small Aortic Annulus: A Systematic Literature Review.

Cabrucci F, Baudo M, Yamashita Y, Dokollari A, Sicouri S, Ramlawi B J Pers Med. 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 39338191 PMC: 11433187. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14090937.

References
1.
Hoffmann G, Ogbamicael S, Jochens A, Frank D, Lutter G, Cremer J . Impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch following aortic valve replacement on short-term survival: a retrospective single center analysis of 632 consecutive patients with isolated stented biological aortic valve replacement. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014; 62(6):469-74. DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1363498. View

2.
Rodes-Cabau J, Pibarot P, Suri R, Kodali S, Thourani V, Szeto W . Impact of aortic annulus size on valve hemodynamics and clinical outcomes after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement: insights from the PARTNER Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; 7(5):701-11. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001681. View

3.
Guimaraes L, Voisine P, Mohammadi S, Kalavrouzioutis D, Dumont E, Doyle D . Valve Hemodynamics Following Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Small Aortic Annulus. Am J Cardiol. 2020; 125(6):956-963. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.12.020. View

4.
Biasco L, Cerrato E, Tersalvi G, Pedrazzini G, Wilkins B, Faletra F . WorldwIde SurvEy on Clinical and Anatomical Factors Driving the Choice of Transcatheter Aortic Valve pRostheses. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020; 7:38. PMC: 7098951. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.00038. View

5.
Deeb G, Chetcuti S, Yakubov S, Patel H, Grossman P, Kleiman N . Impact of Annular Size on Outcomes After Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018; 105(4):1129-1136. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.08.059. View