» Articles » PMID: 37333985

A Novel Glycolysis-related Gene Signature for Predicting the Prognosis of Multiple Myeloma

Abstract

Metabolic reprogramming is an important hallmark of cancer. Glycolysis provides the conditions on which multiple myeloma (MM) thrives. Due to MM's great heterogeneity and incurability, risk assessment and treatment choices are still difficult. We constructed a glycolysis-related prognostic model by Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression analysis. It was validated in two independent external cohorts, cell lines, and our clinical specimens. The model was also explored for its biological properties, immune microenvironment, and therapeutic response including immunotherapy. Finally, multiple metrics were combined to construct a nomogram to assist in personalized prediction of survival outcomes. A wide range of variants and heterogeneous expression profiles of glycolysis-related genes were observed in MM. The prognostic model behaved well in differentiating between populations with various prognoses and proved to be an independent prognostic factor. This prognostic signature closely coordinated with multiple malignant features such as high-risk clinical features, immune dysfunction, stem cell-like features, cancer-related pathways, which was associated with the survival outcomes of MM. In terms of treatment, the high-risk group showed resistance to conventional drugs such as bortezomib, doxorubicin and immunotherapy. The joint scores generated by the nomogram showed higher clinical benefit than other clinical indicators. The experiments with cell lines and clinical subjects further provided convincing evidence for our study. We developed and validated the utility of the MM glycolysis-related prognostic model, which provides a new direction for prognosis assessment, treatment options for MM patients.

Citing Articles

Single-cell analysis of neoplastic plasma cells identifies myeloma pathobiology mediators and potential targets.

Moreno Rueda L, Wang H, Akagi K, Dang M, Vora A, Qin L Cell Rep Med. 2025; 6(2):101925.

PMID: 39855192 PMC: 11866523. DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101925.


Implications of rapid population growth on survey design and HIV estimates in the Rakai Community Cohort Study (RCCS), Uganda.

Khalifa A, Ssekubugu R, Lessler J, Wawer M, Santelli J, Hoffman S BMJ Open. 2023; 13(7):e071108.

PMID: 37495389 PMC: 10373715. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071108.

References
1.
Long Z, Wang L, Zheng F, Chen J, Luo Y, Tu X . A novel compound against oncogenic Aurora kinase A overcomes imatinib resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia cells. Int J Oncol. 2015; 46(6):2488-96. DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2015.2960. View

2.
Mazzera L, Lombardi G, Abeltino M, Ricca M, Donofrio G, Giuliani N . Aurora and IKK kinases cooperatively interact to protect multiple myeloma cells from Apo2L/TRAIL. Blood. 2013; 122(15):2641-53. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2013-02-482356. View

3.
McBrayer S, Cheng J, Singhal S, Krett N, Rosen S, Shanmugam M . Multiple myeloma exhibits novel dependence on GLUT4, GLUT8, and GLUT11: implications for glucose transporter-directed therapy. Blood. 2012; 119(20):4686-97. PMC: 3367873. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-09-377846. View

4.
Kyle R, Remstein E, Therneau T, Dispenzieri A, Kurtin P, Hodnefield J . Clinical course and prognosis of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356(25):2582-90. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa070389. View

5.
Nikonova A, Astsaturov I, Serebriiskii I, Dunbrack Jr R, Golemis E . Aurora A kinase (AURKA) in normal and pathological cell division. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012; 70(4):661-87. PMC: 3607959. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-012-1073-7. View