» Articles » PMID: 37330786

Effect of Diaphragm Manual Release Versus Conventional Breathing Exercises and Prone Positioning on Physical Functional Performance in Women with COVID-19: A Randomized Trial

Overview
Date 2023 Jun 18
PMID 37330786
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Manual therapy has recently gained much interest in managing COVID-19 patients. This study aimed to mainly compare the effect of diaphragm manual release to the effect of conventional breathing exercises and prone positioning on physical functional performance in women with COVID-19.

Methods: Forty COVID-19 women patients completed this study. They were randomly assigned to two groups. Group A received diaphragm manual release, and group B received conventional breathing exercises and prone positioning. Both groups received pharmacological treatment. Inclusion criteria were moderate COVID-19 illness, women patients, and ages from 35 to 45 years. The outcome measures were 6-min walk distance (6MWD), chest expansion, Barthel index (BI), oxygen saturation, fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS), and Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnea scale.

Results: Both groups showed significant improvements in all outcome measures compared to the baseline (p < 0.001). Compared to group B, group A showed more significant improvements in the 6MWD (MD, 22.75 m; 95% CI, 15.21 to 30.29; p < 0.001), chest expansion (MD, 0.80 cm; 95% CI, 0.46 to 1.14; p < 0.001), BI (MD, 9.50; 95% CI, 5.69 to 13.31; p < 0.001), the O saturation (MD, 1.3%; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.89; p < 0.001), the FAS (MD, -4.70; 95% CI, -6.69 to -2.71; p < 0.001), and dyspnea severity assessed by the MRC dyspnea scale (p = 0.013) post-intervention.

Conclusion: Combined with pharmacological treatment, diaphragm manual release could be superior to conventional breathing exercises and prone positioning in improving physical functional performance, chest expansion, daily living activities, O saturation, and measures of fatigue and dyspnea in middle-aged women with moderate COVID-19 illness.

Trial Registration: Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (PACTR), retrospective, PACTR202302877569441.

Citing Articles

Impact of COVID-19 on Diaphragmatic Function: Understanding Multiorgan Involvement and Long-Term Consequences.

Pietranis K, Kostro A, Dzieciol-Anikiej Z, Moskal-Jasinska D, Kuryliszyn-Moskal A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(21).

PMID: 39518632 PMC: 11546792. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13216493.

References
1.
Nair A, Alaparthi G, Krishnan S, Rai S, Anand R, Acharya V . Comparison of Diaphragmatic Stretch Technique and Manual Diaphragm Release Technique on Diaphragmatic Excursion in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Crossover Trial. Pulm Med. 2019; 2019:6364376. PMC: 6335861. DOI: 10.1155/2019/6364376. View

2.
MAHONEY F, BARTHEL D . FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. Md State Med J. 1965; 14:61-5. View

3.
Cortinovis M, Perico N, Remuzzi G . Long-term follow-up of recovered patients with COVID-19. Lancet. 2021; 397(10270):173-175. PMC: 7833833. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00039-8. View

4.
Simonelli C, Paneroni M, Vitacca M, Ambrosino N . Measures of physical performance in COVID-19 patients: a mapping review. Pulmonology. 2021; 27(6):518-528. PMC: 8221906. DOI: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2021.06.005. View

5.
Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B . Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989; 42(8):703-9. DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(89)90065-6. View