» Articles » PMID: 37328796

Improving Eye Care Quality Through Brief Verbal Intervention on Optometry Service Provider by Using Unannounced Standardized Patient with Refractive Error: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background: Improper refractive correction can be harmful to eye health, aggravating the burden of vision impairment. During most optometry clinical consultations, practitioner-patient interactions play a key role. Maybe it is feasible for patients themselves to do something to get high-quality optometry. But the present empirical research on the quality improvement of eye care needs to be strengthened. The study aims to test the effect of the brief verbal intervention (BVI) through patients on the quality of optometry service.

Methods: This study will take unannounced standardized patient (USP) with refractive error as the core research tool, both in measurement and intervention. The USP case and the checklist will be developed through a standard protocol and assessed for validity and reliability before its full use. USP will be trained to provide standardized responses during optical visits and receive baseline refraction by the skilled study optometrist who will be recruited within each site. A multi-arm parallel-group randomized trial will be used, with one common control and three intervention groups. The study will be performed in four cities, Guangzhou and three cities in Inner Mongolia, China. A total of 480 optometry service providers (OSPs) will be stratified and randomly selected and divided into four groups. The common control group will receive USP usual visits (without intervention), and three intervention groups will separately receive USP visits with three kinds of BVI on the patient side. A detailed outcome evaluation will include the optometry accuracy, optometry process, patient satisfaction, cost information and service time. Descriptive analysis will be performed for the survey results, and the difference in outcomes between interventions and control providers will be compared and statistically tested using generalized linear models (GLMs).

Discussion: This research will help policymakers understand the current situation and influencing factors of refractive error care quality, and then implement precise policies; at the same time, explore short and easy interventions for patients to improve the quality of optometry service.

Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200062819. Registered on August 19, 2022.

Citing Articles

Effect of no eyeglasses sales on the quality of eye care: an experimental evidence from China.

Wang N, Li Y, Wu S, Liu Y, Nie J, Wu J BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):422.

PMID: 38336621 PMC: 10858552. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-17882-7.

References
1.
Ang M, Flanagan J, Wong C, Muller A, Davis A, Keys D . Review: Myopia control strategies recommendations from the 2018 WHO/IAPB/BHVI Meeting on Myopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020; 104(11):1482-1487. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-315575. View

2.
Zhang M, Lv H, Gao Y, Griffiths S, Sharma A, Lam D . Visual morbidity due to inaccurate spectacles among school children in rural China: the See Well to Learn Well Project, report 1. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009; 50(5):2011-7. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-2849. View

3.
. Trends in prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment over 30 years: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob Health. 2020; 9(2):e130-e143. PMC: 7820390. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30425-3. View

4.
Rhodes K, Miller F . Simulated patient studies: an ethical analysis. Milbank Q. 2012; 90(4):706-24. PMC: 3530739. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00680.x. View

5.
Kaner E, Beyer F, Muirhead C, Campbell F, Pienaar E, Bertholet N . Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 2:CD004148. PMC: 6491186. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004148.pub4. View