» Articles » PMID: 37323373

Prospective Analysis of the Physiological Changes Caused by Prolonged Use of N95-type Masks

Overview
Journal Ann Thorac Med
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2023 Jun 16
PMID 37323373
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The clinical and physiological effects of long-duration use of N95-type masks without ventilation valves, on health-care workers during the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, were evaluated.

Methods: All volunteering personnel working in operating theater or intensive care unit, using nonventilated N95 type respiratory masks, minimum for a 2-h noninterrupted duration were observed. The partial oxygen saturation (SpO) and heart rate (HR) were recorded before wearing the N95 mask and at 1 and 2 h. Volunteers were then questioned for any symptoms.

Results: A total of 210 measurements were completed in 42 (24 males and 18 females) eligible volunteers, each having 5 measurements, on different days. The median age was 32.7. Premask, 1 h, and 2 h median values for SpO were 99%, 97%, and 96%, respectively ( < 0.001). The median HR was 75 premask, 79 at 1 h, and 84/min at 2 h ( < 0.001). A significant difference between all three consecutive measurements of HR was achieved. Statistical difference was only reached between premask and other SpO measurements (1 and 2 h). Complaints seen in the group were head ache (36%), shortness of breath (27%), palpitation (18%), and nausea feeling (2%). Two individuals took off their masks to breathe, on 87 and 105 min, respectively.

Conclusions: Long duration (>1 h) use of N95-type masks causes a significant reduction in SpO measurements and increase in HR. Despite being an essential personal protective equipment in COVID-19 pandemic, it should be used with short intermittent time periods in health-care providers with known heart disease, pulmonary insufficiency, or psychiatric disorders.

References
1.
Wizner K, Nasarwanji M, Fisher E, Steege A, Boiano J . Exploring respiratory protection practices for prominent hazards in healthcare settings. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2018; 15(8):588-597. PMC: 6201744. DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2018.1473581. View

2.
Lim E, Seet R, Lee K, Wilder-Smith E, Chuah B, Ong B . Headaches and the N95 face-mask amongst healthcare providers. Acta Neurol Scand. 2006; 113(3):199-202. PMC: 7159726. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2005.00560.x. View

3.
Kwon J, Burnham C, Reske K, Liang S, Hink T, Wallace M . Assessment of Healthcare Worker Protocol Deviations and Self-Contamination During Personal Protective Equipment Donning and Doffing. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017; 38(9):1077-1083. PMC: 6263164. DOI: 10.1017/ice.2017.121. View

4.
Baig A, Knapp C, Eagan A, Radonovich Jr L . Health care workers' views about respirator use and features that should be included in the next generation of respirators. Am J Infect Control. 2009; 38(1):18-25. PMC: 7132692. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.09.005. View

5.
Fisher E, Shaffer R . Considerations for recommending extended use and limited reuse of filtering facepiece respirators in health care settings. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2014; 11(8):D115-28. PMC: 4610368. DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2014.902954. View