» Articles » PMID: 37323223

Clinical Utility of Urinary Mulberry Bodies/cells Testing in the Diagnosis of Fabry Disease

Abstract

Introduction: Variants in the galactosidase alpha () gene cause Fabry disease (FD), an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by α-galactosidase A (α-GAL) deficiency. Recently, disease-modifying therapies have been developed, and simple diagnostic biomarkers for FD are required to initiate these therapies in the early stages of the disease. Detection of urinary mulberry bodies and cells (MBs/MCs) is beneficial for diagnosing FD. However, few studies have evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of urinary MBs/MCs in FD. Herein, we retrospectively evaluated the diagnostic ability of urinary MBs/MCs for FD.

Methods: We analyzed the medical records of 189 consecutive patients (125 males and 64 females) who underwent MBs/MCs testing. Out of these, two female patients had already been diagnosed with FD at the time of testing, and the remaining 187 patients were suspected of having FD and underwent both gene sequencing and/or α-GalA enzymatic testing.

Results: Genetic testing did not confirm the diagnosis in 50 females (26.5%); hence, they were excluded from the evaluation. Two patients were previously diagnosed with FD, and sixteen were newly diagnosed. Among these 18 patients, 15, including two who had already developed HCM at diagnosis, remained undiagnosed until targeted genetic screening of at-risk family members of patients with FD was performed. The accuracy of urinary MBs/MCs testing exhibited a sensitivity of 0.944, specificity of 1, positive predictive value of 1, and negative predictive value of 0.992.

Conclusions: MBs/MCs testing is highly accurate in diagnosing FD and should be considered during the initial evaluation prior to genetic testing, particularly in female patients.

Citing Articles

Effects of switching from agalsidase-α to agalsidase-β on biomarkers, renal and cardiac parameters, and disease severity in fabry disease forming neutralizing antidrug antibodies: a case report.

Shima H, Tsukimura T, Shiga T, Togawa T, Sakuraba H, Doi T CEN Case Rep. 2023; 13(4):290-296.

PMID: 38135868 PMC: 11294308. DOI: 10.1007/s13730-023-00843-1.

References
1.
Sawada T, Kido J, Yoshida S, Sugawara K, Momosaki K, Inoue T . Newborn screening for Fabry disease in the western region of Japan. Mol Genet Metab Rep. 2020; 22:100562. PMC: 6961758. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2019.100562. View

2.
Eng C, Guffon N, Wilcox W, Germain D, Lee P, Waldek S . Safety and efficacy of recombinant human alpha-galactosidase A replacement therapy in Fabry's disease. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345(1):9-16. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200107053450102. View

3.
Germain D, Moiseev S, Suarez-Obando F, Al Ismaili F, Al Khawaja H, Altarescu G . The benefits and challenges of family genetic testing in rare genetic diseases-lessons from Fabry disease. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2021; 9(5):e1666. PMC: 8172211. DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1666. View

4.
Moiseev S, Tao E, Moiseev A, Bulanov N, Filatova E, Fomin V . The Benefits of Family Screening in Rare Diseases: Genetic Testing Reveals 165 New Cases of Fabry Disease among At-Risk Family Members of 83 Index Patients. Genes (Basel). 2022; 13(9). PMC: 9498688. DOI: 10.3390/genes13091619. View

5.
Nakamichi T, Miyazaki M, Nakayama K, Sato M, Akiu N, Sato T . Fabry's disease discovered with chance urinary mulberry cells: a case report. CEN Case Rep. 2017; 2(1):49-52. PMC: 5413727. DOI: 10.1007/s13730-012-0038-x. View