» Articles » PMID: 37318596

Response Uncertainty Influences Response Bias in the Sustained Attention to Response Task: a Signal Detection Theory Perspective

Overview
Journal Psychol Res
Specialty Psychology
Date 2023 Jun 15
PMID 37318596
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the current investigation, we modified the high Go, low No-Go Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) by replacing the single response on Go trials with a dual response to increase response uncertainty. In three experiments, a total of 80 participants completed either the original SART with no response uncertainty regarding the Go stimuli, or versions of the dual response SART in which response probabilities for the two possible responses to the Go stimuli varied from 0.9-0.1, 0.7-0.3, to 0.5-0.5. This resulted in a scale of increasing response uncertainty based on information theory to the Go stimuli. The probability of No-Go withhold stimuli was kept.11 in all experiments. Using the Signal Detection Theory perspective proposed by Bedi et al. (Psychological Research: 1-10, 2022), we predicted that increasing response uncertainty would result in a conservative response bias shift, noted by decreased errors of commission and slower response times to both Go and No-Go stimuli. These predictions were verified. The errors of commission in the SART may not be a measures of conscious awareness per se, but instead indicative of the level of participant trigger happiness-the willingness to respond quickly.

Citing Articles

Improving auditory alarm sensitivity during simulated aeronautical decision-making: the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with computerized working memory training.

Zhu R, Ma X, Wang Z, Hui Q, You X Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025; 10(1):11.

PMID: 40055254 PMC: 11889327. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-025-00620-x.

References
1.
Aitken J, Pagan O, Wong C, Bayley B, Helton W, Kaplan S . Task-related and task-unrelated thoughts in runners and equestrians: Measurement issues in evaluations of thought content. Appl Ergon. 2023; 110:104011. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104011. View

2.
Baddeley A, Colquhoun W . Signal probability and vigilance: a reappraisal of the 'signal-rate' effect. Br J Psychol. 1969; 60(2):169-78. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1969.tb01189.x. View

3.
Baldwin C, Lewis B . Positive valence music restores executive control over sustained attention. PLoS One. 2017; 12(11):e0186231. PMC: 5690656. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186231. View

4.
Bedi A, Russell P, Helton W . Go-stimuli probability influences response bias in the sustained attention to response task: a signal detection theory perspective. Psychol Res. 2022; 87(2):509-518. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-022-01679-7. View

5.
Bellgrove M, Hawi Z, Kirley A, Gill M, Robertson I . Dissecting the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) phenotype: sustained attention, response variability and spatial attentional asymmetries in relation to dopamine transporter (DAT1) genotype. Neuropsychologia. 2005; 43(13):1847-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.03.011. View