» Articles » PMID: 37316256

Assessing Violence Risk in First-episode Psychosis: External Validation, Updating and Net Benefit of a Prediction Tool (OxMIV)

Overview
Journal BMJ Ment Health
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 2023 Jun 14
PMID 37316256
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Violence perpetration is a key outcome to prevent for an important subgroup of individuals presenting to mental health services, including early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services. Needs and risks are typically assessed without structured methods, which could facilitate consistency and accuracy. Prediction tools, such as OxMIV (Oxford Mental Illness and Violence tool), could provide a structured risk stratification approach, but require external validation in clinical settings.

Objectives: We aimed to validate and update OxMIV in first-episode psychosis and consider its benefit as a complement to clinical assessment.

Methods: A retrospective cohort of individuals assessed in two UK EIP services was included. Electronic health records were used to extract predictors and risk judgements made by assessing clinicians. Outcome data involved police and healthcare records for violence perpetration in the 12 months post-assessment.

Findings: Of 1145 individuals presenting to EIP services, 131 (11%) perpetrated violence during the 12 month follow-up. OxMIV showed good discrimination (area under the curve 0.75, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.80). Calibration-in-the-large was also good after updating the model constant. Using a 10% cut-off, sensitivity was 71% (95% CI 63% to 80%), specificity 66% (63% to 69%), positive predictive value 22% (19% to 24%) and negative predictive value 95% (93% to 96%). In contrast, clinical judgement sensitivity was 40% and specificity 89%. Decision curve analysis showed net benefit of OxMIV over comparison approaches.

Conclusions: OxMIV performed well in this real-world validation, with improved sensitivity compared with unstructured assessments.

Clinical Implications: Structured tools to assess violence risk, such as OxMIV, have potential in first-episode psychosis to support a stratified approach to allocating non-harmful interventions to individuals who may benefit from the largest absolute risk reduction.

Citing Articles

Suicide risk assessment tools and prediction models: new evidence, methodological innovations, outdated criticisms.

Seyedsalehi A, Fazel S BMJ Ment Health. 2024; 27(1).

PMID: 38485246 PMC: 11021746. DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2024-300990.


The Effect of Missing Item Data on the Relative Predictive Accuracy of Correctional Risk Assessment Tools.

Perley-Robertson B, Babchishin K, Helmus L Assessment. 2024; 31(8):1643-1657.

PMID: 38323522 PMC: 11490059. DOI: 10.1177/10731911231225191.


Violence in schizophrenia: triangulating the evidence on perpetration risk.

Whiting D, Gulati G, Geddes J, Dean K, Fazel S World Psychiatry. 2024; 23(1):158-160.

PMID: 38214634 PMC: 10785986. DOI: 10.1002/wps.21171.


Predictive tools in psychosis: what is 'good enough'?.

Seyedsalehi A, Lennox B Nat Rev Neurol. 2023; 19(4):191-192.

PMID: 36879034 PMC: 9987363. DOI: 10.1038/s41582-023-00787-1.

References
1.
Puntis S, Whiting D, Pappa S, Lennox B . Development and external validation of an admission risk prediction model after treatment from early intervention in psychosis services. Transl Psychiatry. 2021; 11(1):35. PMC: 7801610. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-020-01172-y. View

2.
Puntis S, Minichino A, De Crescenzo F, Cipriani A, Lennox B, Harrison R . Specialised early intervention teams (extended time) for recent-onset psychosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 11:CD013287. PMC: 8094422. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013287.pub2. View

3.
Moons K, Wolff R, Riley R, Whiting P, Westwood M, Collins G . PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2019; 170(1):W1-W33. DOI: 10.7326/M18-1377. View

4.
Sariaslan A, Arseneault L, Larsson H, Lichtenstein P, Fazel S . Risk of Subjection to Violence and Perpetration of Violence in Persons With Psychiatric Disorders in Sweden. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020; 77(4):359-367. PMC: 6990843. DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.4275. View

5.
Whiting D, Lichtenstein P, Fazel S . Violence and mental disorders: a structured review of associations by individual diagnoses, risk factors, and risk assessment. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020; 8(2):150-161. DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30262-5. View