» Articles » PMID: 37315576

The Optimal Time Between Embolization and Surgery for Hypervascular Spinal Metastatic Tumors : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview
Date 2023 Jun 14
PMID 37315576
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Preoperative transarterial embolization (TAE) of tumor feeders in hypervascular spine metastasis is known to reduce intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL) during surgery. The effect of TAE varies for several reasons, and one controllable factor is the timing between embolization and surgery. However, the adequate timing remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the timing and other factors that reduce EBL in spinal metastasis surgery through a meta-analysis.

Methods: A comprehensive database search was performed to identify direct comparative studies of EBL stratified by the timing of surgery after TAE for spinal metastasis. EBL was analyzed according to the timing of surgery and other factors. Subgroup analyses were also performed. The difference in EBL was calculated as the mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: Among seven studies, 196 and 194 patients underwent early and late surgery after TAE, respectively. The early surgery was defined as within 1-2 days after TAE, while the late surgery group received surgery later. Overall, the MD in EBL was not different according to the timing of surgery (MD, 86.3 mL; 95% CI, -95.5 to 268.1 mL; p=0.35). A subgroup analysis of the complete embolization group demonstrated that patients who underwent early surgery within 24 hours after TAE had significantly less bleeding (MD, 233.3 mL; 95% CI, 76.0 to 390.5 mL; p=0.004). In cases of partial embolization, EBL was not significantly different regardless of the time interval.

Conclusion: Complete embolization followed by early spinal surgery within 24 hours may reduce intraoperative bleeding for the patients with hypervascular spinal metastasis.

Citing Articles

Answer to the letter to the editor concerning "Current state of preoperative embolization for spinal metastasis - A survey by the EANS spine section".

Motov S, Stengel F, Ringel F, Bozinov O, Stienen M Brain Spine. 2025; 5():104160.

PMID: 39810927 PMC: 11732059. DOI: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.104160.


Current state of preoperative embolization for spinal metastasis - A survey by the EANS spine section.

Motov S, Stengel F, Ringel F, Bozinov O, Stienen M Brain Spine. 2023; 3:102712.

PMID: 38021014 PMC: 10668085. DOI: 10.1016/j.bas.2023.102712.

References
1.
Kumar N, Zaw A, Khine H, Maharajan K, Wai K, Tan B . Blood Loss and Transfusion Requirements in Metastatic Spinal Tumor Surgery: Evaluation of Influencing Factors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016; 23(6):2079-86. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5092-8. View

2.
Kumar N, Tan B, Zaw A, Khine H, Maharajan K, Lau L . The role of preoperative vascular embolization in surgery for metastatic spinal tumours. Eur Spine J. 2016; 25(12):3962-3970. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4494-4. View

3.
Ma J, Tullius T, Ha T . Update on Preoperative Embolization of Bone Metastases. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2019; 36(3):241-248. PMC: 6699956. DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1693120. View

4.
De La Garza Ramos R, Echt M, Benton J, Gelfand Y, Longo M, Yanamadala V . Accuracy of Freehand versus Navigated Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw Placement in Patients with Metastatic Tumors of the Spine. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2020; 63(6):777-783. PMC: 7671770. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2020.0001. View

5.
Griessenauer C, Salem M, Hendrix P, Foreman P, Ogilvy C, Thomas A . Preoperative Embolization of Spinal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg. 2015; 87:362-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.11.064. View