Guidance on Selecting a Translational Framework for Intervention Development: Optimizing Interventions for Impact

Overview

Journal J Clin Transl Sci

Publisher Cambridge University Press

Date 2023 Jun 14

PMID 37313386

Authors

Kate Guastaferro

Angela F Pfammatter

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Intervention development frameworks offer the behavioral sciences a systematic and rigorous empirical process to guide the translation of basic science into practice in pursuit of desirable public health and clinical outcomes. The multiple frameworks that have emerged share a goal of optimization during intervention development and can increase the likelihood of arriving at an effective and disseminable intervention. Yet, the process of optimizing an intervention differs functionally and conceptually across frameworks, creating confusion and conflicting guidance on when and how to optimize. This paper seeks to facilitate the use of translational intervention development frameworks by providing a blueprint for selecting and using a framework by considering the process of optimization as conceptualized by each. First, we operationalize optimization and contextualize its role in intervention development. Next, we provide brief overviews of three translational intervention development frameworks (ORBIT, MRC, and MOST), identifying areas of overlap and divergence thereby aligning core concepts across the frameworks to improve translation. We offer considerations and concrete use cases for investigators seeking to identify and use a framework in their intervention development research. We push forward an agenda of a norm to use and specify frameworks in behavioral science to support a more rapid translational pipeline.

Citing Articles

Preparing to implement Floreciendo with Latina teens and their female caregivers: Integrating implementation science and the multiphase optimization strategy framework.

Merrill K, Silva J, Sedeno A, Salgado S, Vargas S, Cano J Transl Behav Med. 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 40052537 PMC: 11886812. DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibaf005.

Contextual determinates of under-five malnutrition in mining communities: a critical review of nutrition interventions for optimal impact.

Nyirenda H, Mulenga D, Nyambe-Silavwe H Front Public Health. 2025; 13:1482200.

PMID: 40013029 PMC: 11861209. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1482200.

Just-In-Time Adaptive Interventions to Promote Behavioral Health: Protocol for a Systematic Review.

Henry L, Blay-Tofey M, Haeffner C, Raymond C, Tandilashvili E, Terry N JMIR Res Protoc. 2025; 14:e58917.

PMID: 39932763 PMC: 11862764. DOI: 10.2196/58917.

Advancing translational research in digital cardiac rehabilitation: The preparation phase of the Multiphase Optimization Strategy.

Kenny E, McEvoy J, McSharry J, Taylor R, Byrne M Transl Behav Med. 2024; 15(1.

PMID: 39688502 PMC: 11756285. DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibae068.

Leveraging Implementation Science at the Early-Stage Development of a Novel Telehealth-Delivered Fear of Exercise Program to Understand Intervention Feasibility and Implementation Potential: Feasibility Behavioral Intervention Study.

Duran A, Cumella R, Mendieta M, Keener-Denoia A, Lopez Veneros D, Farris S JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e55137.

PMID: 39531636 PMC: 11599889. DOI: 10.2196/55137.

References

Levati S, Campbell P, Frost R, Dougall N, Wells M, Donaldson C . Optimisation of complex health interventions prior to a randomised controlled trial: a scoping review of strategies used. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016; 2:17. PMC: 5153688. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-016-0058-y. View

Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M . Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008; 337:a1655. PMC: 2769032. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.a1655. View

Packel L, Fahey C, Njau P, McCoy S . Implementation Science Using Proctor's Framework and an Adaptation of the Multiphase Optimization Strategy: Optimizing a Financial Incentive Intervention for HIV Treatment Adherence in Tanzania. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019; 82 Suppl 3:S332-S338. PMC: 6880807. DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002196. View

Balas E, Boren S . Managing Clinical Knowledge for Health Care Improvement. Yearb Med Inform. 2016; (1):65-70. View

Aarons G, Hurlburt M, Horwitz S . Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011; 38(1):4-23. PMC: 3025110. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7. View

Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson S, Craig P, Baird J, Blazeby J . A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2021; 374:n2061. PMC: 8482308. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n2061. View

Michie S, van Stralen M, West R . The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011; 6:42. PMC: 3096582. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42. View

OCathain A, Croot L, Duncan E, Rousseau N, Sworn K, Turner K . Guidance on how to develop complex interventions to improve health and healthcare. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(8):e029954. PMC: 6701588. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029954. View

Rutter H, Savona N, Glonti K, Bibby J, Cummins S, Finegood D . The need for a complex systems model of evidence for public health. Lancet. 2017; 390(10112):2602-2604. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31267-9. View

10.

Freedland K . Purpose-guided trial design in health-related behavioral intervention research. Health Psychol. 2020; 39(6):539-548. DOI: 10.1037/hea0000867. View

11.

Collins F . Reengineering translational science: the time is right. Sci Transl Med. 2011; 3(90):90cm17. PMC: 5101940. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002747. View

12.

Collins L, Strayhorn J, Vanness D . One view of the next decade of research on behavioral and biobehavioral approaches to cancer prevention and control: intervention optimization. Transl Behav Med. 2021; 11(11):1998-2008. PMC: 8634530. DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibab087. View

13.

Almirall D, Nahum-Shani I, Sherwood N, Murphy S . Introduction to SMART designs for the development of adaptive interventions: with application to weight loss research. Transl Behav Med. 2014; 4(3):260-74. PMC: 4167891. DOI: 10.1007/s13142-014-0265-0. View

14.

Morris Z, Wooding S, Grant J . The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. J R Soc Med. 2011; 104(12):510-20. PMC: 3241518. DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110180. View

15.

Moore G, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W . Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015; 350:h1258. PMC: 4366184. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h1258. View

16.

OCathain A, Croot L, Sworn K, Duncan E, Rousseau N, Turner K . Taxonomy of approaches to developing interventions to improve health: a systematic methods overview. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019; 5:41. PMC: 6419435. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-019-0425-6. View

17.

Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W . The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013; 46(1):81-95. DOI: 10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6. View

18.

Ioannidis J, Greenland S, Hlatky M, Khoury M, Macleod M, Moher D . Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. Lancet. 2014; 383(9912):166-75. PMC: 4697939. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62227-8. View

19.

Damschroder L, Aron D, Keith R, Kirsh S, Alexander J, Lowery J . Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009; 4:50. PMC: 2736161. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50. View

20.

Czajkowski S, Hunter C . From ideas to interventions: A review and comparison of frameworks used in early phase behavioral translation research. Health Psychol. 2022; 40(12):829-844. DOI: 10.1037/hea0001095. View