Mapping of a Soybean Rust Resistance in PI 594756 at the Locus

Overview

Journal Mol Breed

Specialties Biotechnology
Molecular Biology

Date 2023 Jun 14

PMID 37313128

Authors

Luciane G Barros

Bruna B Avelino

Danielle C G da Silva

Everton G C Ferreira

Fernanda M Castanho

Marcio E Ferreira

Valeria S Lopes-Caitar

Silvana R R Marin

Carlos A A Arias

Ivani de O N Lopes

Ricardo V Abdelnoor

Francismar C Marcelino-Guimaraes

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11032-023-01358-4.

Citing Articles

Allelic variability in the Rpp1 locus conferring resistance to Asian soybean rust revealed by genome-wide association.

Aoyagi L, Ferreira E, Gregorio da Silva D, Dos Santos A, Avelino B, Lopes-Caitar V BMC Plant Biol. 2024; 24(1):743.

PMID: 39095733 PMC: 11297723. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-024-05454-1.

Soybean-Phakopsora pachyrhizi interactions: towards the development of next-generation disease-resistant plants.

Sartor Chicowski A, Bredow M, Utiyama A, Marcelino-Guimaraes F, Whitham S Plant Biotechnol J. 2023; 22(2):296-315.

PMID: 37883664 PMC: 10826999. DOI: 10.1111/pbi.14206.

Patterns of asexual reproduction of the soybean aphid, (Matsumura), with and without the secondary symbionts and on susceptible and resistant soybean genotypes.

Giordano R, Weber E, Mitacek R, Flores A, Ledesma A, De A Front Microbiol. 2023; 14:1209595.

PMID: 37720159 PMC: 10501154. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1209595.

References

Jubic L, Saile S, Furzer O, El Kasmi F, Dangl J . Help wanted: helper NLRs and plant immune responses. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2019; 50:82-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2019.03.013. View

Chen H, Zhao S, Yang Z, Sha A, Wan Q, Zhang C . Genetic analysis and molecular mapping of resistance gene to Phakopsora pachyrhizi in soybean germplasm SX6907. Theor Appl Genet. 2015; 128(4):733-43. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-015-2468-2. View

Pedley K, Pandey A, Ruck A, Lincoln L, Whitham S, Graham M . Rpp1 Encodes a ULP1-NBS-LRR Protein That Controls Immunity to Phakopsora pachyrhizi in Soybean. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2018; 32(1):120-133. DOI: 10.1094/MPMI-07-18-0198-FI. View

Bradbury P, Zhang Z, Kroon D, Casstevens T, Ramdoss Y, Buckler E . TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics. 2007; 23(19):2633-5. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm308. View

Ouellette L, Reid R, Blanchard S, Brouwer C . LinkageMapView-rendering high-resolution linkage and QTL maps. Bioinformatics. 2017; 34(2):306-307. PMC: 5860205. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx576. View

Kawashima C, Guimaraes G, Nogueira S, MacLean D, Cook D, Steuernagel B . A pigeonpea gene confers resistance to Asian soybean rust in soybean. Nat Biotechnol. 2016; 34(6):661-5. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3554. View

Kim K, Unfried J, Hyten D, Frederick R, Hartman G, Nelson R . Molecular mapping of soybean rust resistance in soybean accession PI 561356 and SNP haplotype analysis of the Rpp1 region in diverse germplasm. Theor Appl Genet. 2012; 125(6):1339-52. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-012-1932-5. View

Periyannan S, Milne R, Figueroa M, Lagudah E, Dodds P . An overview of genetic rust resistance: From broad to specific mechanisms. PLoS Pathog. 2017; 13(7):e1006380. PMC: 5509339. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006380. View

Lin F, Chhapekar S, Canella Vieira C, Da Silva M, Rojas A, Lee D . Breeding for disease resistance in soybean: a global perspective. Theor Appl Genet. 2022; 135(11):3773-3872. PMC: 9729162. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-022-04101-3. View

10.

Miles M, Morel W, Ray J, Smith J, Frederick R, Hartman G . Adult Plant Evaluation of Soybean Accessions for Resistance to Phakopsora pachyrhizi in the Field and Greenhouse in Paraguay. Plant Dis. 2019; 92(1):96-105. DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-92-1-0096. View

11.

Alonso-Blanco C, Koornneef M, van Ooijen J . QTL analysis. Methods Mol Biol. 2006; 323:79-99. DOI: 10.1385/1-59745-003-0:79. View

12.

Maldonado Dos Santos J, Valliyodan B, Joshi T, Khan S, Liu Y, Wang J . Evaluation of genetic variation among Brazilian soybean cultivars through genome resequencing. BMC Genomics. 2016; 17:110. PMC: 4752768. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-016-2431-x. View

13.

Kourelis J, van der Hoorn R . Defended to the Nines: 25 Years of Resistance Gene Cloning Identifies Nine Mechanisms for R Protein Function. Plant Cell. 2018; 30(2):285-299. PMC: 5868693. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.17.00579. View

14.

Ray J, Morel W, Smith J, Frederick R, Miles M . Genetics and mapping of adult plant rust resistance in soybean PI 587886 and PI 587880A. Theor Appl Genet. 2009; 119(2):271-80. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-009-1036-z. View

15.

Cook D, Bayless A, Wang K, Guo X, Song Q, Jiang J . Distinct Copy Number, Coding Sequence, and Locus Methylation Patterns Underlie Rhg1-Mediated Soybean Resistance to Soybean Cyst Nematode. Plant Physiol. 2014; 165(2):630-647. PMC: 4044848. DOI: 10.1104/pp.114.235952. View

16.

Browning S, Browning B . Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. Am J Hum Genet. 2007; 81(5):1084-97. PMC: 2265661. DOI: 10.1086/521987. View

17.

McHale L, Haun W, Xu W, Bhaskar P, Anderson J, Hyten D . Structural variants in the soybean genome localize to clusters of biotic stress-response genes. Plant Physiol. 2012; 159(4):1295-308. PMC: 3425179. DOI: 10.1104/pp.112.194605. View

18.

Dixon M, Hatzixanthis K, Jones D, Harrison K, Jones J . The tomato Cf-5 disease resistance gene and six homologs show pronounced allelic variation in leucine-rich repeat copy number. Plant Cell. 1998; 10(11):1915-25. PMC: 143956. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.10.11.1915. View

19.

Garcia A, Calvo E, de Souza Kiihl R, Harada A, Hiromoto D, Vieira L . Molecular mapping of soybean rust (Phakopsora pachyrhizi) resistance genes: discovery of a novel locus and alleles. Theor Appl Genet. 2008; 117(4):545-53. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-008-0798-z. View

20.

Yorinori J, Paiva W, Frederick R, Costamilan L, Bertagnolli P, Hartman G . Epidemics of Soybean Rust (Phakopsora pachyrhizi) in Brazil and Paraguay from 2001 to 2003. Plant Dis. 2019; 89(6):675-677. DOI: 10.1094/PD-89-0675. View