» Articles » PMID: 37312682

Designing Catalysts with Deep Generative Models and Computational Data. A Case Study for Suzuki Cross Coupling Reactions

Overview
Journal Digit Discov
Date 2023 Jun 14
PMID 37312682
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The need for more efficient catalytic processes is ever-growing, and so are the costs associated with experimentally searching chemical space to find new promising catalysts. Despite the consolidated use of density functional theory (DFT) and other atomistic models for virtually screening molecules based on their simulated performance, data-driven approaches are rising as indispensable tools for designing and improving catalytic processes. Here, we present a deep learning model capable of generating new catalyst-ligand candidates by self-learning meaningful structural features solely from their language representation and computed binding energies. We train a recurrent neural network-based Variational Autoencoder (VAE) to compress the molecular representation of the catalyst into a lower dimensional latent space, in which a feed-forward neural network predicts the corresponding binding energy to be used as the optimization function. The outcome of the optimization in the latent space is then reconstructed back into the original molecular representation. These trained models achieve state-of-the-art predictive performances in catalysts' binding energy prediction and catalysts' design, with a mean absolute error of 2.42 kcal mol and an ability to generate 84% valid and novel catalysts.

Citing Articles

Homogeneous catalyst graph neural network: A human-interpretable graph neural network tool for ligand optimization in asymmetric catalysis.

Aguilar-Bejarano E, Ozcan E, Rit R, Li H, Lam H, Moore J iScience. 2025; 28(3):111881.

PMID: 40060895 PMC: 11889620. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.111881.


Generative Artificial Intelligence for Designing Multi-Scale Hydrogen Fuel Cell Catalyst Layer Nanostructures.

Niu Z, Zhao W, Deng H, Tian L, Pinfield V, Ming P ACS Nano. 2024; .

PMID: 38984372 PMC: 11308925. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.4c04943.


A genetic optimization strategy with generality in asymmetric organocatalysis as a primary target.

Gallarati S, van Gerwen P, Laplaza R, Brey L, Makaveev A, Corminboeuf C Chem Sci. 2024; 15(10):3640-3660.

PMID: 38455002 PMC: 10915838. DOI: 10.1039/d3sc06208b.


Unveiling human origins of replication using deep learning: accurate prediction and comprehensive analysis.

Yin Z, Lai F, Gao F Brief Bioinform. 2023; 25(1).

PMID: 38008420 PMC: 10676776. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbad432.

References
1.
Huang B, Anatole von Lilienfeld O . Quantum machine learning using atom-in-molecule-based fragments selected on the fly. Nat Chem. 2020; 12(10):945-951. DOI: 10.1038/s41557-020-0527-z. View

2.
Vaucher A, Schwaller P, Geluykens J, Nair V, Iuliano A, Laino T . Inferring experimental procedures from text-based representations of chemical reactions. Nat Commun. 2021; 12(1):2573. PMC: 8102565. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22951-1. View

3.
Meyer B, Sawatlon B, Heinen S, Anatole von Lilienfeld O, Corminboeuf C . Machine learning meets volcano plots: computational discovery of cross-coupling catalysts. Chem Sci. 2018; 9(35):7069-7077. PMC: 6137445. DOI: 10.1039/c8sc01949e. View

4.
Gimeno A, Ojeda-Montes M, Tomas-Hernandez S, Cereto-Massague A, Beltran-Debon R, Mulero M . The Light and Dark Sides of Virtual Screening: What Is There to Know?. Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20(6). PMC: 6470506. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20061375. View

5.
Dollar O, Joshi N, Beck D, Pfaendtner J . Attention-based generative models for molecular design. Chem Sci. 2021; 12(24):8362-8372. PMC: 8221056. DOI: 10.1039/d1sc01050f. View