» Articles » PMID: 37311398

A Role for Breast Ultrasound Artificial Intelligence Decision Support in the Evaluation of Small Invasive Lobular Carcinomas

Overview
Journal Clin Imaging
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Radiology
Date 2023 Jun 13
PMID 37311398
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) decision support (DS) system in the ultrasound (US) assessment of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast, a cancer that can demonstrate variable appearance and present insidiously.

Methods: Retrospective review was performed of 75 patients with 83 ILC diagnosed by core biopsy or surgery between November 2017 and November 2019. ILC characteristics (size, shape, echogenicity) were recorded. AI DS output (lesion characteristics, likelihood of malignancy) was compared to radiologist assessment.

Results: The AI DS system interpreted 100% of ILCs as suspicious or probably malignant (100% sensitivity, and 0% false negative rate). 99% (82/83) of detected ILCs were initially recommended for biopsy by the interpreting breast radiologist, and 100% (83/83) were recommended for biopsy after one additional ILC was identified on same-day repeat diagnostic ultrasound. For lesions in which the AI DS output was probably malignant, but assigned a BI-RADS 4 assessment by the radiologist, the median lesion size was 1 cm, compared with a median lesion size of 1.4 cm for those given a BI-RADS 5 assessment (p = 0.006). These results suggest that AI may offer more useful DS in smaller sub-centimeter lesions in which shape, margin status, or vascularity is more difficult to discern. Only 20% of patients with ILC were assigned a BI-RADS 5 assessment by the radiologist.

Conclusion: The AI DS accurately characterized 100% of detected ILC lesions as suspicious or probably malignant. AI DS may be helpful in increasing radiologist confidence when assessing ILC on ultrasound.

Citing Articles

Unique Molecular Alteration of Lobular Breast Cancer: Association with Pathological Classification, Tumor Biology and Behavior, and Clinical Management.

Zhang H, Peng Y Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39941785 PMC: 11816017. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17030417.


Enhancing Breast Cancer Detection through Advanced AI-Driven Ultrasound Technology: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Vis-BUS.

Kwon H, Oh S, Kim M, Kim Y, Jung G, Lee H Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(17).

PMID: 39272652 PMC: 11394308. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14171867.


Breast Radiologists' Perceptions on the Detection and Management of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma: Most Agree Imaging Beyond Mammography Is Warranted.

Coffey K, Berg W, Dodelzon K, Jochelson M, Mullen L, Parikh J J Breast Imaging. 2024; 6(2):157-165.

PMID: 38340343 PMC: 10983784. DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbad112.

References
1.
Arpino G, Bardou V, Clark G, Elledge R . Infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: tumor characteristics and clinical outcome. Breast Cancer Res. 2004; 6(3):R149-56. PMC: 400666. DOI: 10.1186/bcr767. View

2.
Jiang Y, Edwards A, Newstead G . Artificial Intelligence Applied to Breast MRI for Improved Diagnosis. Radiology. 2020; 298(1):38-46. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020200292. View

3.
Selinko V, Middleton L, Dempsey P . Role of sonography in diagnosing and staging invasive lobular carcinoma. J Clin Ultrasound. 2004; 32(7):323-32. DOI: 10.1002/jcu.20052. View

4.
Brouckaert O, Laenen A, Smeets A, Christiaens M, Vergote I, Wildiers H . Prognostic implications of lobular breast cancer histology: new insights from a single hospital cross-sectional study and SEER data. Breast. 2014; 23(4):371-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.01.007. View

5.
Kolb T, Lichy J, Newhouse J . Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology. 2002; 225(1):165-75. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2251011667. View