» Articles » PMID: 37308923

Safety and Incremental Prognostic Value of Stress Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Patients with Known Chronic Kidney Disease

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the main cause of mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Although several studies have demonstrated the consistently high prognostic value of stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), its prognostic value in patients with CKD is not well established. We aimed to assess the safety and the incremental prognostic value of vasodilator stress perfusion CMR in consecutive symptomatic patients with known CKD.

Methods: Between 2008 and 2021, we conducted a retrospective dual center study with all consecutive symptomatic patients with known stage 3 CKD, defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between 30 and 60 ml/min/1.73 m, referred for vasodilator stress CMR. All patients with eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m (n = 62) were excluded due the risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. All patients were followed for the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as cardiac death or recurrent nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI). Cox regression analysis was used to determine the prognostic value of stress CMR parameters.

Results: Of 825 patients with known CKD (71.4 ± 8.8 years, 70% men), 769 (93%) completed the CMR protocol. Follow-up was available in 702 (91%) (median follow-up 6.4 (4.0-8.2) years). Stress CMR was well tolerated without occurrence of death or severe adverse event related to the injection of gadolinium or cases of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. The presence of inducible ischemia was associated with the occurrence of MACE (hazard ratio [HR] 12.50; 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.50-20.8; p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, ischemia and late gadolinium enhancement were independent predictors of MACE (HR 15.5; 95% CI 7.72 to 30.9; and HR 4.67 [95% CI 2.83-7.68]; respectively, both p < 0.001). After adjustment, stress CMR findings showed the best improvement in model discrimination and reclassification above traditional risk factors (C-statistic improvement: 0.13; NRI = 0.477; IDI = 0.049).

Conclusions: In patients with known stage 3 CKD, stress CMR is safe and its findings have an incremental prognostic value to predict MACE over traditional risk factors.

Citing Articles

Prognostic significance of dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with chronic kidney disease and known or suspected coronary artery disease: a 5-year follow-up study.

Leevongsakorn R, Kaolawanich Y, Karaketklang K, Ratanasit N Heart Vessels. 2024; 40(3):210-218.

PMID: 39311944 DOI: 10.1007/s00380-024-02464-9.

References
1.
Hicks K, Tcheng J, Bozkurt B, Chaitman B, Cutlip D, Farb A . 2014 ACC/AHA Key Data Elements and Definitions for Cardiovascular Endpoint Events in Clinical Trials: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Writing Committee to Develop.... J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 66(4):403-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.12.018. View

2.
Levey A, Eckardt K, Tsukamoto Y, Levin A, Coresh J, Rossert J . Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: a position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int. 2005; 67(6):2089-100. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00365.x. View

3.
Charytan D, Kuntz R, Mauri L, deFilippi C . Distribution of coronary artery disease and relation to mortality in asymptomatic hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007; 49(3):409-16. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.11.042. View

4.
Kistorp C, Raymond I, Pedersen F, Gustafsson F, Faber J, Hildebrandt P . N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, C-reactive protein, and urinary albumin levels as predictors of mortality and cardiovascular events in older adults. JAMA. 2005; 293(13):1609-16. DOI: 10.1001/jama.293.13.1609. View

5.
Pezel T, Silva L, Bau A, Teixiera A, Jerosch-Herold M, Coelho-Filho O . What Is the Clinical Impact of Stress CMR After the ISCHEMIA Trial?. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021; 8:683434. PMC: 8216080. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.683434. View