» Articles » PMID: 37307448

Unraveling Female Communication Through Scent Marks in the Norway Rat

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2023 Jun 12
PMID 37307448
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Chemical communication by females remains poorly understood, with most attention focused on female advertisement of sexual receptivity to males or mother-offspring communication. However, in social species, scents are likely to be important for mediating competition and cooperation between females determining individual reproductive success. Here, we explore chemical signaling by female laboratory rats () to test i) whether females target their deployment of scent information differentially according to their sexual receptivity and the genetic identity of both female and male conspecifics signaling in the local environment and ii) whether females are attracted to gain the same or different information from female scents compared to males. Consistent with targeting of scent information to colony members of similar genetic background, female rats increased scent marking in response to scents from females of the same strain. Females also suppressed scent marking in response to male scent from a genetically foreign strain while sexually receptive. Proteomic analysis of female scent deposits revealed a complex protein profile, contributed from several sources but dominated by clitoral gland secretion. In particular, female scent marks contained a series of clitoral-derived hydrolases and proteolytically truncated major urinary proteins (MUPs). Manipulated blends of clitoral secretion and urine from estrus females were strongly attractive to both sexes, while voided urine alone stimulated no interest. Our study reveals that information about female receptive status is shared between females as well as with males, while clitoral secretions containing a complex set of truncated MUPs and other proteins play a key role in female communication.

Citing Articles

The role of male scent in female attraction in the bank vole, Myodes glareolus.

Coombes H, Prescott M, Stockley P, Beynon R, Hurst J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):4812.

PMID: 38413659 PMC: 10899570. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55235-x.

References
1.
Stopkova R, Stopka P, Janotova K, Jedelsky P . Species-specific expression of major urinary proteins in the house mice (Mus musculus musculus and Mus musculus domesticus). J Chem Ecol. 2007; 33(4):861-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10886-007-9262-9. View

2.
Takacs S, Gries R, Gries G . Sex Hormones Function as Sex Attractant Pheromones in House Mice and Brown Rats. Chembiochem. 2017; 18(14):1391-1395. DOI: 10.1002/cbic.201700224. View

3.
Peden B, Timberlake W . Environmental influences on flank marking and urine marking by female and male rats (Rattus norvegicus). J Comp Psychol. 1990; 104(2):122-30. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.104.2.122. View

4.
Ghys L, Paepe D, Smets P, Lefebvre H, Delanghe J, Daminet S . Cystatin C: a new renal marker and its potential use in small animal medicine. J Vet Intern Med. 2014; 28(4):1152-64. PMC: 4857948. DOI: 10.1111/jvim.12366. View

5.
Roy A, NEUHAUS O . Identification of rat urinary proteins by zone and immunoelectrophoresis. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1966; 121(3):894-9. DOI: 10.3181/00379727-121-30917. View