The Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic on Female Patients Seeking or Undergoing Fertility Treatment in a Single Fertilisation Clinic in Greece: An International, Cross-sectional Study

Overview

Journal J Hum Reprod Sci

Date 2023 Jun 12

PMID 37305776

Authors

Konstantina Pappa

Emmanouil M Xydias

Apostolos C Ziogas

Kanelina Bimba

Elias Tsakos

Efstratios Kolibianakis

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The temporary delay in fertility treatments due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, in combination with the imposed lockdowns, has created psychological distress and anxiety amongst infertile patients.

Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate how the pandemic has influenced assisted reproduction technology (ART) patients in Greece, during the second wave of the pandemic. An additional aim was to examine the effects of the pandemic on cross-border patients in particular, compared to national ones.

Settings And Design: This study was a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study, distributed to 409 patients of a single fertilisation (IVF) clinic in Greece, during the period between January until the end of April 2021.

Materials And Methods: The survey was conducted online via E-mail and was distributed to national and international female patients of a single IVF clinic in Greece, who were undergoing ART treatment during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Patient participation was anonymous, and participants provided informed consent for collection and publication of data.

Statistical Analysis Used: The mean values of baseline characteristics, along with answer percentages per questionnaire item, were calculated. Collected data were cross-tabulated, and the Chi-square test was used as a measurement of the differences between national and cross-border patients. A value lower than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were conducted using the SPSS Statistics software.

Results: From 409 initial candidates, 106 women, with a mean age of 41.2 years, completed the questionnaire (26% response rate). The majority of national patients did not experience any delays in their fertility plans (62%), while cross-border patients experienced over 6 months of delays (54.7%). The main reason for fertility postponement was travel restrictions due to COVID-19 for cross-border patients (62.5%), while national patients cited additional reasons. The majority of patients experienced a degree of stress (65.2%) due to the delays, however were not fearful of COVID-19 infection (54.7%). Most patients were aware of the protective measures taken by IVF clinics (80.2%), and this was a determinant factor (71.7%) for their decision to restart their fertility treatment.

Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns had a significant emotional impact on patient receiving or undergoing ART treatment in Greece. This impact was more pronounced on cross-border patients. This highlights the need for continuation of ART care, with the appropriate protective measures, during the pandemic, as well as during similar times of crisis in the future.

Citing Articles

COVID-19 Vaccines and Assisted Reproductive Techniques: A Systematic Review.

Satorres-Perez E, Martinez-Varea A, Morales-Rosello J J Pers Med. 2023; 13(8).

PMID: 37623482 PMC: 10455825. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13081232.

Delivery of a Healthy Child Through International Gestational Surrogacy 10 Years Following Female Fertility Preservation and In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) for Recurrent Breast Cancer: A Case Report.

Tsakos E, Xydias E, Ziogas A, Tsagias N, Pappa K, Stergioula A Cureus. 2023; 15(8):e43827.

PMID: 37608906 PMC: 10440491. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43827.

References

Gupta M, Jaiswal P, Bansiwal R, Sethi A, Vanamail P, Kachhawa G . Anxieties and apprehensions among women waiting for fertility treatments during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020; 152(3):441-443. PMC: 9087520. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13468. View

Tokgoz V, Kaya Y, Tekin A . The level of anxiety in infertile women whose ART cycles are postponed due to the COVID-19 outbreak. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2020; 43(2):114-121. DOI: 10.1080/0167482X.2020.1806819. View

Cirillo M, Rizzello F, Badolato L, De Angelis D, Evangelisti P, Coccia M . The effects of COVID-19 lockdown on lifestyle and emotional state in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology: Results of an Italian survey. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021; 50(8):102079. PMC: 8060062. DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102079. View

Akkaya-Kalayci T, Kothgassner O, Wenzel T, Goreis A, Chen A, Ceri V . The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Mental Health and Psychological Well-Being of Young People Living in Austria and Turkey: A Multicenter Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(23). PMC: 7730981. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17239111. View

Lawson A, McQueen D, Swanson A, Confino R, Feinberg E, Pavone M . Psychological distress and postponed fertility care during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021; 38(2):333-341. PMC: 7783482. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-02023-x. View

Salama M, Isachenko V, Isachenko E, Rahimi G, Mallmann P, Westphal L . Cross border reproductive care (CBRC): a growing global phenomenon with multidimensional implications (a systematic and critical review). J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018; 35(7):1277-1288. PMC: 6063838. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-018-1181-x. View

Ben-Kimhy R, Youngster M, Medina-Artom T, Avraham S, Gat I, Haham L . Fertility patients under COVID-19: attitudes, perceptions and psychological reactions. Hum Reprod. 2020; 35(12):2774-2783. PMC: 7499650. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa248. View

Kaur H, Pranesh G, Rao K . Emotional Impact of Delay in Fertility Treatment due to COVID-19 Pandemic. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2021; 13(4):317-322. PMC: 7879841. DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_144_20. View

Gordon J, Balsom A . The psychological impact of fertility treatment suspensions during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One. 2020; 15(9):e0239253. PMC: 7500693. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239253. View

10.

Tippett A . Life on pause: An analysis of UK fertility patients' coping mechanisms after the cancellation of fertility treatment due to COVID-19. J Health Psychol. 2021; 27(7):1583-1600. PMC: 9092918. DOI: 10.1177/1359105321999711. View

11.

Seifer D, Petok W, Agrawal A, Glenn T, Bayer A, Witt B . Psychological experience and coping strategies of patients in the Northeast US delaying care for infertility during the COVID-19 pandemic. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021; 19(1):28. PMC: 7899935. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-021-00721-4. View

12.

Seibel M, TAYMOR M . Emotional aspects of infertility. Fertil Steril. 1982; 37(2):137-45. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)46029-2. View

13.

Haham L, Youngster M, Shani A, Yee S, Ben-Kimhy R, Medina-Artom T . Suspension of fertility treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic: views, emotional reactions and psychological distress among women undergoing fertility treatment. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021; 42(4):849-858. PMC: 7816616. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.01.007. View

14.

Esposito V, Rania E, Lico D, Pedri S, Fiorenza A, Strati M . Influence of COVID-19 pandemic on the psychological status of infertile couples. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020; 253:148-153. PMC: 7443353. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.08.025. View

15.

Anifandis G, Messini C, Daponte A, Messinis I . COVID-19 and fertility: a virtual reality. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020; 41(2):157-159. PMC: 7206439. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.05.001. View

16.

Ugbolue U, Duclos M, Urzeala C, Berthon M, Kulik K, Bota A . An Assessment of the Novel COVISTRESS Questionnaire: COVID-19 Impact on Physical Activity, Sedentary Action and Psychological Emotion. J Clin Med. 2020; 9(10). PMC: 7603364. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9103352. View

17.

Boivin J, Harrison C, Mathur R, Burns G, Pericleous-Smith A, Gameiro S . Patient experiences of fertility clinic closure during the COVID-19 pandemic: appraisals, coping and emotions. Hum Reprod. 2020; 35(11):2556-2566. PMC: 7454659. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa218. View

18.

Vaughan D, Shah J, Penzias A, Domar A, Toth T . Infertility remains a top stressor despite the COVID-19 pandemic. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020; 41(3):425-427. PMC: 7274108. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.05.015. View

19.

Madjunkov M, Dviri M, Librach C . A comprehensive review of the impact of COVID-19 on human reproductive biology, assisted reproduction care and pregnancy: a Canadian perspective. J Ovarian Res. 2020; 13(1):140. PMC: 7694590. DOI: 10.1186/s13048-020-00737-1. View

20.

Alviggi C, Esteves S, Orvieto R, Conforti A, La Marca A, Fischer R . COVID-19 and assisted reproductive technology services: repercussions for patients and proposal for individualized clinical management. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020; 18(1):45. PMC: 7218705. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-020-00605-z. View