» Articles » PMID: 37304761

Effects of Mindfulness and Fatigue on Emotional Processing: an Event-related Potentials Study

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2023 Jun 12
PMID 37304761
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Fatigue is a common experience in everyday life. People who experience fatigue will have more intense negative emotions, and at the same time, their positive emotions will decrease, impairing the individual's emotional processing ability. In previous research, mindfulness meditation reduces the intensity of negative emotional stimuli. However, if individuals continue to be affected by negative emotions when they are fatigued, it is unclear whether mindfulness can buffer the negative association between fatigue and emotions. This study examined whether mindfulness meditation affects the association between fatigue and emotions, using event-related potentials (ERPs). One hundred and forty-five participants completed the experiment. They were randomly assigned to the Mindfulness or Non-mindfulness group; and they were presented with positive, neutral, or negative pictures in an emotional processing task before and after mindfulness or rest. Late positive potential (LPP) is an important indicator of emotional stimuli perceived by individuals, and positive or negative pictures can induce an increase in LPP amplitude more than neutral pictures. Our findings suggest that fatigue significantly affected individuals' LPP amplitudes in the early, mid, and late windows in the Non-mindfulness group, specifically, the more fatigued individuals had lower LPP amplitudes, but not in the Mindfulness group. These results suggest that in a state of fatigue, mindful individuals are able to maintain responsiveness to emotional stimuli by maintaining LPP amplitude. Our study has demonstrated that mindfulness meditation, to some extent, offsets the negative association of fatigue with the neural activation of emotions.

Citing Articles

Identifying fatigue of climbing workers using physiological data based on the XGBoost algorithm.

Xu Y, Jian Q, Zhu K, Wang M, Hou W, Gong Z Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1462675.

PMID: 39444965 PMC: 11496261. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1462675.


Are Deaf College Students More Sensitive to Unfair Information? Evidence from an ERP Study.

Sun L, Dong Q, Du X, Wei D Brain Sci. 2024; 14(8).

PMID: 39199481 PMC: 11352934. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14080788.


Implementation Readiness and Initial Effects of a Brief Mindfulness Audio Intervention Compared With a Brief Music Control During Daily Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Pilot Study.

Victorson D, Mishra K, Sauer J, Langford G, Maletich C, Horowitz B Glob Adv Integr Med Health. 2024; 13:27536130241249140.

PMID: 38694593 PMC: 11062214. DOI: 10.1177/27536130241249140.

References
1.
Murata A, Moser J, Kitayama S . Culture shapes electrocortical responses during emotion suppression. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012; 8(5):595-601. PMC: 3682443. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nss036. View

2.
Deng X, Yang M, An S . Differences in frontal EEG asymmetry during emotion regulation between high and low mindfulness adolescents. Biol Psychol. 2020; 158:107990. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107990. View

3.
Dennis T, Hajcak G . The late positive potential: a neurophysiological marker for emotion regulation in children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009; 50(11):1373-83. PMC: 3019134. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02168.x. View

4.
Cahn B, Polich J . Meditation states and traits: EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies. Psychol Bull. 2006; 132(2):180-211. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.180. View

5.
Beck A, Epstein N, Brown G, Steer R . An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988; 56(6):893-7. DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.56.6.893. View