» Articles » PMID: 37299481

Development and Relative Validation of a Food Frequency Questionnaire to Assess Non-Nutritive Sweeteners Intake Among Pregnant Women in Santiago, Chile: A Pilot Study

Overview
Journal Nutrients
Date 2023 Jun 10
PMID 37299481
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Studies on the effects of non-nutritive sweeteners (NNSs) among pregnant women are scarce and have produced mixed results. One of the major challenges is to accurately assess NNS intake, especially in countries that have implemented policies to prevent obesity and where many foods and beverages have been progressively reformulated to partially or totally replace sugar with NNSs. This study aimed to develop and assess the relative validity of a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) for use in pregnant women. We developed an FFQ to examine the intake of seven NNSs (acesulfame-k, aspartame, cyclamate, saccharin, sucralose, steviol glycosides, and D-tagatose). This questionnaire was piloted in 29 pregnant women (median age = 31.2 y; 25th-75th percentile: 26.9-34.7) to assess NNS intake over the previous month, compared to 3-day dietary records (3-DR). The validity of this dietary method was assessed using Spearman's correlation coefficient, Lin´s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and Bland-Altman plots. Spearman's correlations between the FFQ on NNSs and 3-DR ranged from 0.50 for acesulfame K to 0.83 for saccharin. CCC ranged between 0.22 and 0.66. The Bland-Altman plots showed an overestimation of saccharin, sucralose, and steviol glycosides intake by the FFQ on NNSs compared with 3-DR, and an underestimation of acesulfame K and aspartame. Overall, the NNSs most frequently consumed were sucralose, and none of the participants exceeded the acceptable daily intake for any of the NNSs evaluated. The FFQ on NNSs seems to be reasonably valid in the assessment of NNSs among pregnant women.

References
1.
Koo T, Li M . A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15(2):155-63. PMC: 4913118. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. View

2.
Ayoob K . Consumption of non-nutritive sweeteners during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 223(6):952-953. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.020. View

3.
Mertens E, Kuijsten A, Geleijnse J, Boshuizen H, Feskens E, Vant Veer P . FFQ versus repeated 24-h recalls for estimating diet-related environmental impact. Nutr J. 2019; 18(1):2. PMC: 6323679. DOI: 10.1186/s12937-018-0425-z. View

4.
Pase M, Himali J, Beiser A, Aparicio H, Satizabal C, Vasan R . Sugar- and Artificially Sweetened Beverages and the Risks of Incident Stroke and Dementia: A Prospective Cohort Study. Stroke. 2017; 48(5):1139-1146. PMC: 5405737. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016027. View

5.
Lohner S, Toews I, Meerpohl J . Health outcomes of non-nutritive sweeteners: analysis of the research landscape. Nutr J. 2017; 16(1):55. PMC: 5591507. DOI: 10.1186/s12937-017-0278-x. View