» Articles » PMID: 37298671

Metabolic Processes and Biological Macromolecules Defined the Positive Effects of Protein-Rich Biostimulants on Sugar Beet Plant Development

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Jun 10
PMID 37298671
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Protein-based biostimulants (PBBs) have a positive effect on plant development, although the biological background for this effect is not well understood. Here, hydrolyzed wheat gluten (HWG) and potato protein film (PF) in two levels (1 and 2 g/kg soil) and in two different soils (low and high nutrient; LNC and HNC) were used as PBBs. The effect of these PBBs on agronomic traits, sugars, protein, and peptides, as well as metabolic processes, were evaluated on sugar beet in comparison with no treatment (control) and treatment with nutrient solution (NS). The results showed a significant growth enhancement of the plants using HWG and PF across the two soils. Sucrose and total sugar content in the roots were high in NS-treated plants and correlated to root growth in HNC soil. Traits related to protein composition, including nitrogen, peptide, and RuBisCO contents, were enhanced in PBB-treated plants (mostly for HWG and PF at 2 g/kg soil) by 100% and >250% in HNC and LNC, respectively, compared to control. The transcriptomic analysis revealed that genes associated with ribosomes and photosynthesis were upregulated in the leaf samples of plants treated with either HWG or PP compared to the control. Furthermore, genes associated with the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites were largely down-regulated in root samples of HWG or PF-treated plants. Thus, the PBBs enhanced protein-related traits in the plants through a higher transcription rate of genes related to protein- and photosynthesis, which resulted in increased plant growth, especially when added in certain amounts (2 g/kg soil). However, sucrose accumulation in the roots of sugar beet seemed to be related to the easy availability of nitrogen.

Citing Articles

GLYCINE betaine and seaweed-based biostimulants improved leaf water status and enhanced photosynthetic activity in sweet cherry trees.

Afonso S, Oliveira I, Guedes F, Meyer A, Goncalves B Front Plant Sci. 2025; 15:1467376.

PMID: 39759231 PMC: 11695132. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1467376.


Integrated multi-omic approach reveals the effect of a Graminaceae-derived biostimulant and its lighter fraction on salt-stressed lettuce plants.

Monterisi S, Zhang L, Garcia-Perez P, Zuluaga M, Ciriello M, El-Nakhel C Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):10710.

PMID: 38729985 PMC: 11087557. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61576-4.


Amino Acids Biostimulants and Protein Hydrolysates in Agricultural Sciences.

Sun W, Shahrajabian M, Kuang Y, Wang N Plants (Basel). 2024; 13(2).

PMID: 38256763 PMC: 10819947. DOI: 10.3390/plants13020210.

References
1.
Hanifah N, Ghadamgahi F, Ghosh S, Ortiz R, Whisson S, Vetukuri R . Comparative transcriptome profiling provides insights into the growth promotion activity of strain SLU99 in tomato and potato plants. Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1141692. PMC: 10393259. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1141692. View

2.
Abou Chehade L, Al Chami Z, De Pascali S, Cavoski I, Fanizzi F . Biostimulants from food processing by-products: agronomic, quality and metabolic impacts on organic tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). J Sci Food Agric. 2017; 98(4):1426-1436. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.8610. View

3.
Rasovsky M, Pacuta V, Ducsay L, Lenicka D . Quantity and Quality Changes in Sugar Beet ( Provar. Altissima Doel) Induced by Different Sources of Biostimulants. Plants (Basel). 2022; 11(17). PMC: 9460262. DOI: 10.3390/plants11172222. View

4.
Bolger A, Lohse M, Usadel B . Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30(15):2114-20. PMC: 4103590. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. View

5.
Yu G, Wang M, Huang J, Yin Y, Chen Y, Jiang S . Deep insight into the Ganoderma lucidum by comprehensive analysis of its transcriptome. PLoS One. 2012; 7(8):e44031. PMC: 3428325. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044031. View