» Articles » PMID: 37297831

The Folded Radial Forearm Flap in Lip and Nose Reconstruction-Still a Unique Choice

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Jun 10
PMID 37297831
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

(1) Background: The radial forearm flap (RFF) has evolved as the flap of choice for intraoral mucosal reconstructions, providing thin and pliable skin with a safe blood supply. Perforator flaps such as the anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap are increasingly being discussed for the same applications. (2) Methods: Patient history, treatment details, and outcome of 12 patents with moderate to extended defects of the lip and/or nose area that were reconstructed by a folded radial forearm flap were retrospectively evaluated for oncologic and functional outcomes. (3) Results: The mean oncologic and functional follow-up were 21.1 (min. 3.8; max. 83.3) and 31.2 (min. 6; max. 96) months, respectively. All flaps survived without revision. In eight cases, major lip defects were reconstructed by an RFF; in six patients, the palmaris longus tendon was included for lip suspension. The functional results in terms of eating, drinking, and mouth opening were good in five cases, while three patients were graded as fair due to moderate drooling. In seven cases, the major parts of the nose were reconstructed with two good and five fair (nostril constriction in three cases) functional results. (4) Conclusions: The folded RFF remains a unique free flap option for complex three-dimensional lip and nose reconstructions in terms of flexibility, versatility, and robustness.

Citing Articles

Dovetailing skin incision design of radial forearm free flap for forearm wound closure and maxillofacial reconstruction.

Li S, Huang S, Cao C, Tang D, He Q, Wang A Heliyon. 2024; 10(14):e34613.

PMID: 39113994 PMC: 11305292. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34613.


The Central Facial Defect Reconstruction Using a Radial Forearm Free Flap after Malignant Cutaneous Tumor Ablation.

Cho K, Park J, Eun S J Clin Med. 2023; 12(22).

PMID: 38002760 PMC: 10672586. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12227148.


Radial forearm flap versus antero-lateral thigh flap in oral soft tissue reconstruction: update and statistical analysis on our 77 consecutive cases for an objective selection criteria.

Marra C, Pinto V, Benanti E, De Maria F, Pinelli M, Spaggiari A Acta Biomed. 2023; 94(5):e2023252.

PMID: 37850757 PMC: 10644937. DOI: 10.23750/abm.v94i5.15174.


Risk Factors for Flap Loss: Analysis of Donor and Recipient Vessel Morphology in Patients Undergoing Microvascular Head and Neck Reconstructions.

Schuderer J, Dinh H, Spoerl S, Taxis J, Fiedler M, Gottsauner J J Clin Med. 2023; 12(16).

PMID: 37629249 PMC: 10455344. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12165206.

References
1.
Maruccia M, Orfaniotis G, Ciudad P, Nicoli F, Cigna E, Giudice G . Application of extended bi-pedicle anterolateral thigh free flaps for reconstruction of large defects: A case series. Microsurgery. 2016; 38(1):26-33. DOI: 10.1002/micr.30141. View

2.
Seikaly H, Rieger J, Zalmanowitz J, Tang J, Alkahtani K, Ansari K . Functional soft palate reconstruction: a comprehensive surgical approach. Head Neck. 2008; 30(12):1615-23. DOI: 10.1002/hed.20919. View

3.
Rieger J, Zalmanowitz J, Li S, Tang J, Williams D, Harris J . Speech outcomes after soft palate reconstruction with the soft palate insufficiency repair procedure. Head Neck. 2008; 30(11):1439-44. DOI: 10.1002/hed.20884. View

4.
Menick F . A new modified method for nasal lining: the Menick technique for folded lining. J Surg Oncol. 2006; 94(6):509-14. DOI: 10.1002/jso.20488. View

5.
Jeng S, Kuo Y, Wei F, Su C, Chien C . Total lower lip reconstruction with a composite radial forearm-palmaris longus tendon flap: a clinical series. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 113(1):19-23. DOI: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000090722.16689.9A. View