» Articles » PMID: 37297251

Bone Grafts in Dental Medicine: An Overview of Autografts, Allografts and Synthetic Materials

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Jun 10
PMID 37297251
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This review provides an overview of various materials used in dentistry and oral and maxillofacial surgeries to replace or repair bone defects. The choice of material depends on factors such as tissue viability, size, shape, and defect volume. While small bone defects can regenerate naturally, extensive defects or loss or pathological fractures require surgical intervention and the use of substitute bones. Autologous bone, taken from the patient's own body, is the gold standard for bone grafting but has drawbacks such as uncertain prognosis, surgery at the donor site, and limited availability. Other alternatives for medium and small-sized defects include allografts (from human donors), xenografts (from animals), and synthetic materials with osteoconductive properties. Allografts are carefully selected and processed human bone materials, while xenografts are derived from animals and possess similar chemical composition to human bone. Synthetic materials such as ceramics and bioactive glasses are used for small defects but may lack osteoinductivity and moldability. Calcium-phosphate-based ceramics, particularly hydroxyapatite, are extensively studied and commonly used due to their compositional similarity to natural bone. Additional components, such as growth factors, autogenous bone, and therapeutic elements, can be incorporated into synthetic or xenogeneic scaffolds to enhance their osteogenic properties. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of grafting materials in dentistry, discussing their properties, advantages, and disadvantages. It also highlights the challenges of analyzing in vivo and clinical studies to select the most suitable option for specific situations.

Citing Articles

Biofunctionalization of Collagen Barrier Membranes with Bone-Conditioned Medium, as a Natural Source of Growth Factors, Enhances Osteoblastic Cell Behavior.

Ashoka Sreeja H, Couso-Queiruga E, Raabe C, Chappuis V, Asparuhova M Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(4).

PMID: 40004074 PMC: 11855076. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26041610.


Optimizing β-TCP with E-rhBMP-2-infused fibrin for vertical bone regeneration in a mouse calvarium model.

Zhao K, Ono M, Mu X, Wang Z, Xie S, Yonezawa T Regen Biomater. 2025; 12:rbae144.

PMID: 39990519 PMC: 11846664. DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbae144.


Application of Hydroxyapatite Obtained by Different Techniques: Metabolism and Microarchitecture Characteristics (Review).

Markelov V, Danilko K, Solntsev V, Pyatnitskaya S, Bilyalov A Sovrem Tekhnologii Med. 2025; 16(6):60-75.

PMID: 39896152 PMC: 11780588. DOI: 10.17691/stm2024.16.6.06.


Challenges and Innovations in Alveolar Bone Regeneration: A Narrative Review on Materials, Techniques, Clinical Outcomes, and Future Directions.

Marian D, Toro G, DAmico G, Trotta M, DAmico M, Petre A Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 61(1).

PMID: 39859003 PMC: 11766548. DOI: 10.3390/medicina61010020.


Mimicking osteoid 3D porous dense microfiber silk fibroin embedded poly(vinyl alcohol) scaffold for alveolar ridge preservation.

Sangkert S, Kannan P, Meesane J, Santavalimp K, Phongthanawarakun J, Promkaew W Regen Biomater. 2025; 12:rbae130.

PMID: 39803357 PMC: 11725345. DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbae130.


References
1.
Park J, Jang J, Bae S, An C, Suh J . Bone formation with various bone graft substitutes in critical-sized rat calvarial defect. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20(4):372-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01602.x. View

2.
Teixeira S, Fernandes M, Ferraz M, Monteiro F . Proliferation and mineralization of bone marrow cells cultured on macroporous hydroxyapatite scaffolds functionalized with collagen type I for bone tissue regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010; 95(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32600. View

3.
Teixeira S, Fernandes H, Leusink A, van Blitterswijk C, Ferraz M, Monteiro F . In vivo evaluation of highly macroporous ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009; 93(2):567-75. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32532. View

4.
Scarano A, Degidi M, Iezzi G, Pecora G, Piattelli M, Orsini G . Maxillary sinus augmentation with different biomaterials: a comparative histologic and histomorphometric study in man. Implant Dent. 2006; 15(2):197-207. DOI: 10.1097/01.id.0000220120.54308.f3. View

5.
Oryan A, Alidadi S, Moshiri A, Maffulli N . Bone regenerative medicine: classic options, novel strategies, and future directions. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014; 9(1):18. PMC: 3995444. DOI: 10.1186/1749-799X-9-18. View