» Articles » PMID: 37296961

Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis Status from Primary Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Histology Slides Using Deep Learning: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 Jun 10
PMID 37296961
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Accurate prediction of lymph node metastasis (LNM) status in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) before radical cystectomy can guide the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the extent of pelvic lymph node dissection. We aimed to develop and validate a weakly-supervised deep learning model to predict LNM status from digitized histopathological slides in MIBC.

Methods: We trained a multiple instance learning model with an attention mechanism (namely SBLNP) from a cohort of 323 patients in the TCGA cohort. In parallel, we collected corresponding clinical information to construct a logistic regression model. Subsequently, the score predicted by the SBLNP was incorporated into the logistic regression model. In total, 417 WSIs from 139 patients in the RHWU cohort and 230 WSIs from 78 patients in the PHHC cohort were used as independent external validation sets.

Results: In the TCGA cohort, the SBLNP achieved an AUROC of 0.811 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.771-0.855), the clinical classifier achieved an AUROC of 0.697 (95% CI, 0.661-0.728) and the combined classifier yielded an improvement to 0.864 (95% CI, 0.827-0.906). Encouragingly, the SBLNP still maintained high performance in the RHWU cohort and PHHC cohort, with an AUROC of 0.762 (95% CI, 0.725-0.801) and 0.746 (95% CI, 0.687-0.799), respectively. Moreover, the interpretability of SBLNP identified stroma with lymphocytic inflammation as a key feature of predicting LNM presence.

Conclusions: Our proposed weakly-supervised deep learning model can predict the LNM status of MIBC patients from routine WSIs, demonstrating decent generalization performance and holding promise for clinical implementation.

Citing Articles

Pathology-based deep learning features for predicting basal and luminal subtypes in bladder cancer.

Zheng Z, Dai F, Liu J, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Wang B BMC Cancer. 2025; 25(1):310.

PMID: 39979837 PMC: 11844054. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-025-13688-x.


Deep Learning Predicts Lymphovascular Invasion Status in Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Histopathology.

Jiao P, Wu S, Yang R, Ni X, Wu J, Wang K Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 32(1):598-608.

PMID: 39472420 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16422-2.

References
1.
Sherif A, Holmberg L, Rintala E, Mestad O, Nilsson J, Nilsson S . Neoadjuvant cisplatinum based combination chemotherapy in patients with invasive bladder cancer: a combined analysis of two Nordic studies. Eur Urol. 2004; 45(3):297-303. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2003.09.019. View

2.
Shariat S, Rink M, Ehdaie B, Xylinas E, Babjuk M, Merseburger A . Pathologic nodal staging score for bladder cancer: a decision tool for adjuvant therapy after radical cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2012; 63(2):371-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.008. View

3.
Baltaci S, Resorlu B, Yagci C, Turkolmez K, Gogus C, Beduk Y . Computerized tomography for detecting perivesical infiltration and lymph node metastasis in invasive bladder carcinoma. Urol Int. 2008; 81(4):399-402. DOI: 10.1159/000167836. View

4.
Zheng Q, Yang R, Ni X, Yang S, Xiong L, Yan D . Accurate Diagnosis and Survival Prediction of Bladder Cancer Using Deep Learning on Histological Slides. Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(23). PMC: 9737237. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235807. View

5.
Abdel-Latif M, Abol-Enein H, El-Baz M, Ghoneim M . Nodal involvement in bladder cancer cases treated with radical cystectomy: incidence and prognosis. J Urol. 2004; 172(1):85-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000132132.72351.4c. View