» Articles » PMID: 37288540

Family Screening for Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Aortic Dilatation: a Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Eur Heart J
Date 2023 Jun 8
PMID 37288540
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: International guidelines recommend screening of first-degree relatives (FDR) of people with bicuspid aortic valves (BAVs). However, the prevalence of BAV and of aortic dilatation amongst family members is uncertain.

Methods And Results: A systematic review and meta-analysis of original reports of screening for BAV. Databases including MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from inception to December 2021 using relevant search terms. Data were sought on the screened prevalence of BAV and aortic dilatation. The protocol was specified prior to the searches being performed, and standard meta-analytic techniques were used. Twenty-three observational studies met inclusion criteria (n = 2297 index cases; n = 6054 screened relatives). The prevalence of BAV amongst relatives was 7.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.1%-8.6%] overall and per family was 23.6% (95% CI 18.1%-29.5%). The prevalence of aortic dilatation amongst relatives was 9.4% (95% CI 5.7%-13.9%). Whilst the prevalence of aortic dilatation was particularly high in relatives with BAV (29.2%; 95% CI 15.3%-45.1%), aortic dilatation alongside tricuspid aortic valves was a more frequent finding, as there were many more family members with tricuspid valves than BAV. The prevalence estimate amongst relatives with tricuspid valves (7.0%; 95% CI 3.2%-12.0%) was higher than reported in the general population.

Conclusion: Screening family members of people with BAV can identify a cohort substantially enriched for the presence of bicuspid valve, aortic enlargement, or both. The implications for screening programmes are discussed, including in particular the substantial current uncertainties regarding the clinical implications of aortic findings.

Citing Articles

Radiological Diagnosis and Emergency Management of Aortic Dissection in a Patient With a Fused Bicuspid Aortic Valve: A Case Study.

Alfazzaa T, Almashaqbeh S, Saleh D, Ibrahim S, Alnemrat N Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e73426.

PMID: 39534549 PMC: 11556443. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.73426.


Bicuspid Aortic Valve, from the Unknown till the Perfection of the Species.

Bargagna M, Ascione G, Zancanaro E, Fioravanti F, Sala A, Trumello C Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 25(8):310.

PMID: 39228478 PMC: 11366994. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2508310.


Whole-exome sequencing uncovers the genetic complexity of bicuspid aortic valve in families with early-onset complications.

Mansoorshahi S, Yetman A, Bissell M, Kim Y, Michelena H, De Backer J Am J Hum Genet. 2024; 111(10):2219-2231.

PMID: 39226896 PMC: 11480851. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.08.001.


Valvulopathies and Genetics: Where are We?.

Coll M, Fernandez-Falgueras A, Iglesias A, Brugada R Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 25(2):40.

PMID: 39077344 PMC: 11263169. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2502040.


Discovery and functional investigation of as a new causative gene for human congenital heart disease.

Wang Z, Liu X, Yang C, Zhou H, Li Y, Qiu X Am J Transl Res. 2024; 16(5):2034-2048.

PMID: 38883374 PMC: 11170606. DOI: 10.62347/DGCD4269.


References
1.
Cozijnsen L, Braam R, Bakker-de Boo M, Otten A, Post J, Schermer T . Family screening in patients with isolated bicuspid aortic valve : Restriction to those with aortic dilatation is not justified. Neth Heart J. 2021; 30(4):207-211. PMC: 8941042. DOI: 10.1007/s12471-021-01621-3. View

2.
Martin L, Ramachandran V, Cripe L, Hinton R, Andelfinger G, Tabangin M . Evidence in favor of linkage to human chromosomal regions 18q, 5q and 13q for bicuspid aortic valve and associated cardiovascular malformations. Hum Genet. 2007; 121(2):275-84. DOI: 10.1007/s00439-006-0316-9. View

3.
Guala A, Rodriguez-Palomares J, Galian-Gay L, Teixido-Tura G, Johnson K, Wieben O . Partial Aortic Valve Leaflet Fusion Is Related to Deleterious Alteration of Proximal Aorta Hemodynamics. Circulation. 2019; 139(23):2707-2709. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.039693. View

4.
Newcombe R . Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Stat Med. 1998; 17(8):857-72. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<857::aid-sim777>3.0.co;2-e. View

5.
Massardier C, Desroches F, Singbo N, Cote J, Drolet C, Houde C . First-Degree Relatives Screening of Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valve: Effectiveness and Feasibility in Pediatric Cardiology Daily Practice. Pediatr Cardiol. 2020; 41(8):1645-1650. DOI: 10.1007/s00246-020-02423-x. View