Physicians' Professionalism from the Patients' Perspective: a Qualitative Study at a Single-family Practice in Saudi Arabia

Overview

Journal BMC Med Ethics

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Medical Ethics

Date 2023 Jun 7

PMID 37287002

Authors

Eiad AlFaris

Farhana Irfan

Noura Abouammoh

Nasriah Zakaria

Abdullah Ma Ahmed

Omar Kasule

Dina M Aldosari

Nora A AlSahli

Mohammed Ghatar Alshibani

Gominda Ponnamperuma

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Professionalism is a crucial component of medical practice. It is a culturally sensitive notion that generally consists of behaviors, values, communication, and relationships. This study is a qualitative study exploring physician professionalism from the patients' perspective.

Methods: Focus group discussions with patients attending a family medicine center attached to a tertiary care hospital were carried out using the four gates model of Arabian medical professionalism that is appropriate to Arab culture. Discussions with patients were recorded and transcribed. Data were thematically analyzed using NVivo software.

Results: Three main themes emerged from the data. (1) In dealing with patients, participants expected respect but understood delays in seeing physicians due to their busy schedules. In communication, participants expected to be informed about their health conditions and to have their questions answered. (2) In dealing with tasks, participants expected proper examination and transparency of diagnosis, but some expected the physician to know everything and did not appreciate them seeking outside opinions. They expected to see the same physician at every visit. (3) In physician characteristics preferences, participants preferred friendly smiling physicians. Some cared about the outer appearance of the physician whereas others did not.

Discussion/conclusions: The findings of the study explained only two themes of the four gates model namely dealing with patients and dealing with tasks. Cultural competence and how to benefit from patients' perceptions to be an ideal physician should be incorporated into the process of physicians' training.

References

Phillips D, Brooks F . Women patients' preferences for female or male GPs. Fam Pract. 1999; 15(6):543-7. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/15.6.543. View

Silverman J, Kinnersley P . Doctors'non-verbal behaviour in consultations: look at the patient before you look at the computer. Br J Gen Pract. 2010; 60(571):76-8. PMC: 2814257. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp10X482293. View

Caterinicchio R . Testing plausible path models of interpersonal trust in patient-physician treatment relationships. Soc Sci Med Med Psychol Med Sociol. 1979; 13A(1):81-99. DOI: 10.1016/0160-7979(79)90011-0. View

Langford A, Roberts T, Gupta J, Orellana K, Loeb S . Impact of the Internet on Patient-Physician Communication. Eur Urol Focus. 2019; 6(3):440-444. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.09.012. View

Shakour M, Yamani N, Yousefi A . The Factors Affecting Teaching and Learning Professionalism Among Medical Teachers. Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2018; 37(2):164-174. DOI: 10.1097/HCM.0000000000000213. View

Hoonpongsimanont W, Sahota P, Chen Y, Patel M, Tarapan T, Bengiamin D . Physician professionalism: definition from a generation perspective. Int J Med Educ. 2018; 9:246-252. PMC: 6387766. DOI: 10.5116/ijme.5ba0.a584. View

Cruess S, Cruess R, Steinert Y . Teaching professionalism across cultural and national borders: lessons learned from an AMEE workshop. Med Teach. 2010; 32(5):371-4. DOI: 10.3109/01421591003692730. View

Gross D, Zyzanski S, Borawski E, Cebul R, Stange K . Patient satisfaction with time spent with their physician. J Fam Pract. 1998; 47(2):133-7. View

Palinkas L, Horwitz S, Green C, Wisdom J, Duan N, Hoagwood K . Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2013; 42(5):533-44. PMC: 4012002. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y. View

10.

Al-Eraky M . Twelve Tips for teaching medical professionalism at all levels of medical education. Med Teach. 2015; 37(11):1018-25. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1020288. View

11.

Friedman E, Johnson R . Professionalism, Quality, and Safety for Pediatric Otolaryngologists. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2019; 52(5):969-980. DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2019.06.010. View

12.

Al-Eraky M, Donkers J, Wajid G, van Merrienboer J . A Delphi study of medical professionalism in Arabian countries: the Four-Gates model. Med Teach. 2014; 36 Suppl 1:S8-16. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.886013. View

13.

Quill T, Brody H . Physician recommendations and patient autonomy: finding a balance between physician power and patient choice. Ann Intern Med. 1996; 125(9):763-9. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-125-9-199611010-00010. View

14.

Larsen K, Smith C . Assessment of nonverbal communication in the patient-physician interview. J Fam Pract. 1981; 12(3):481-8. View

15.

Muller E, Zill J, Dirmaier J, Harter M, Scholl I . Assessment of trust in physician: a systematic review of measures. PLoS One. 2014; 9(9):e106844. PMC: 4160203. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106844. View

16.

Frosch D, Tai-Seale M . R-E-S-P-E-C-T--what it means to patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2014; 29(3):427-8. PMC: 3930779. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-013-2710-z. View

17.

Rattani A, Kaakour D, Syed R, Kaakour A . Changing the channel on medical ethics education: systematic review and qualitative analysis of didactic-icebreakers in medical ethics and professionalism teaching. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2020; 39(1):125-140. DOI: 10.1007/s40592-020-00120-2. View

18.

Manzoor F, Wei L, Hussain A, Asif M, Shah S . Patient Satisfaction with Health Care Services; An Application of Physician's Behavior as a Moderator. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(18). PMC: 6765938. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16183318. View

19.

Wearn A, Wilson H, Hawken S, Child S, Mitchell C . In search of professionalism: implications for medical education. N Z Med J. 2010; 123(1314):123-32. View

20.

Ambady N, Laplante D, Nguyen T, Rosenthal R, Chaumeton N, Levinson W . Surgeons' tone of voice: a clue to malpractice history. Surgery. 2002; 132(1):5-9. DOI: 10.1067/msy.2002.124733. View