» Articles » PMID: 37286895

Is Legislation to Prevent Genetic Discrimination Necessary in Japan? An Overview of the Current Policies and Public Attitudes

Overview
Journal J Hum Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 2023 Jun 7
PMID 37286895
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Genetic discrimination (GD) has not been discussed in East Asia as extensively as in Europe and North America. Influenced by UNESCO's universal declaration in 1997, the Japanese government took a stringent approach toward GD by releasing the Basic Principles on Human Genome Research in 2000. However, Japanese society has mostly been ignoring the prevention of GD for decades, and the principle of prohibiting GD was never adhered to in any of the Japanese laws. We conducted anonymous surveys among the general adult population in 2017 and 2022 to explore their experiences of GD and attitudes toward laws carrying penalties to prevent GD in Japan. In both years, approximately 3% of the respondents had experienced some unfavorable treatment regarding their genetic information. They showed higher recognition of the benefits of using genetic information and lower recognition of concerns about using genetic information and GD in 2022 than in 2017. However, the awareness regarding the need for legislation with penalties on GD had increased over the five-year period. In 2022, the framework of a bill to promote genomic medicine and prevent GD without any relevant penalties was released by the Bipartisan Diet Members Caucus. Considering that the absence of regulations may be a barrier to obtaining genomic medicine, as the initial step toward making the prohibition of GD more effective, legislation that no form of GD will be tolerated may stimulate education and awareness regarding respect for the human genome and its diversity.

Citing Articles

(Not So) Lost in Translation: Considering the GA4GH Diversity in Datasets Policy in the Japanese Context.

Sato M, Muto K, Momozawa Y, Joly Y Asian Bioeth Rev. 2025; 17(1):59-72.

PMID: 39896083 PMC: 11785831. DOI: 10.1007/s41649-024-00305-5.


Nationwide survey of the secondary findings in cancer genomic profiling: survey including liquid biopsy.

Shimada S, Yamada T, Minamoto A, Matsukawa M, Yabe I, Tada H J Hum Genet. 2024; 70(1):33-40.

PMID: 39289525 DOI: 10.1038/s10038-024-01294-x.


Newborn Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A 2.5-Year Experience in Hyogo Prefecture, Japan.

Sonehara S, Bo R, Nambu Y, Iketani K, Lee T, Shimomura H Genes (Basel). 2023; 14(12).

PMID: 38137033 PMC: 10742789. DOI: 10.3390/genes14122211.


A conceptual analysis of public opinion regarding genome research in Japan.

Shahrier S, Gaydarska H, Takashima K, Yoshizawa G, Minari J Front Genet. 2023; 14:1170794.

PMID: 38098474 PMC: 10720899. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1170794.

References
1.
Ri I, Kawata J, Nagai A, Muto K . Expectations, concerns, and attitudes regarding whole-genome sequencing studies: a survey of cancer patients, families, and the public in Japan. J Hum Genet. 2022; 68(4):281-285. PMC: 10040335. DOI: 10.1038/s10038-022-01100-6. View

2.
Billings P, Kohn M, de Cuevas M, Beckwith J, Alper J, Natowicz M . Discrimination as a consequence of genetic testing. Am J Hum Genet. 1992; 50(3):476-82. PMC: 1684266. View

3.
Joly Y, Dalpe G . Genetic discrimination still casts a large shadow in 2022. Eur J Hum Genet. 2022; 30(12):1320-1322. PMC: 9712578. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01194-8. View

4.
Kim H, Ho C, Ho C, Athira P, Kato K, De Castro L . Genetic discrimination: introducing the Asian perspective to the debate. NPJ Genom Med. 2021; 6(1):54. PMC: 8249378. DOI: 10.1038/s41525-021-00218-4. View

5.
Joly Y, Huerne K, Arych M, Bombard Y, de Paor A, Dove E . The Genetic Discrimination Observatory: confronting novel issues in genetic discrimination. Trends Genet. 2021; 37(11):951-954. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2021.08.004. View