» Articles » PMID: 37280319

A Multicenter Explanatory Survey of Patients' and Clinicians' Perceptions of Motivational Factors in Rehabilitation

Abstract

Background: Patient motivation is an important determinant of rehabilitation outcomes. Differences in patients' and clinicians' perceptions of motivational factors can potentially hinder patient-centered care. Therefore, we aimed to compare patients' and clinicians' perceptions of the most important factors in motivating patients for rehabilitation.

Methods: This multicenter explanatory survey research was conducted from January to March 2022. In 13 hospitals with an intensive inpatient rehabilitation ward, 479 patients with neurological or orthopedic disorders undergoing inpatient rehabilitation and 401 clinicians, including physicians, physical therapists, occupational therapists, and speech-language-hearing therapists, were purposively selected using inclusion criteria. The participants were asked to choose the most important factor motivating patients for rehabilitation from a list of potential motivational factors.

Results: Here we show that realization of recovery, goal setting, and practice related to the patient's experience and lifestyle are the three factors most frequently selected as most important by patients and clinicians. Only five factors are rated as most important by 5% of clinicians, whereas nine factors are selected by 5% of patients. Of these nine motivational factors, medical information (p < 0.001; phi = -0.14; 95% confidence interval = -0.20 to -0.07) and control of task difficulty (p = 0.011; phi = -0.09; 95% confidence interval = -0.16 to -0.02) are selected by a significantly higher proportion of patients than clinicians.

Conclusions: These results suggest that when determining motivational strategies, rehabilitation clinicians should consider individual patient preferences in addition to using the core motivational factors supported by both parties.

Citing Articles

Patient motivation: A concept analysis.

Khomkham P, Kaewmanee P Belitung Nurs J. 2024; 10(5):490-497.

PMID: 39416359 PMC: 11474273. DOI: 10.33546/bnj.3529.


Applying a Motivational Instructional Design Model to Stroke Rehabilitation: A Feasibility Study on Occupational and Swallowing Therapies.

Oyake K, Watanabe S, Takeuchi A, Yoshida T, Shigematsu T, Natsume Y Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2024; 6(3):100344.

PMID: 39376697 PMC: 11457737. DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100344.


Physical Therapists Use Different Motivational Strategies for Stroke Rehabilitation Tailored to an Individual's Condition: A Qualitative Study.

Oyake K, Sue K, Sumiya M, Tanaka S Phys Ther. 2023; 103(6).

PMID: 37017336 PMC: 10313347. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzad034.

References
1.
Abrahamsen C, Norgaard B . Elderly patients' perspectives on treatment, care and rehabilitation after hip fracture: A qualitative systematic review. Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs. 2020; 41:100811. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijotn.2020.100811. View

2.
Nicholson S, Donaghy M, Johnston M, Sniehotta F, van Wijck F, Johnston D . A qualitative theory guided analysis of stroke survivors' perceived barriers and facilitators to physical activity. Disabil Rehabil. 2014; 36(22):1857-68. DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2013.874506. View

3.
Crocker T, Brown L, Lam N, Wray F, Knapp P, Forster A . Information provision for stroke survivors and their carers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 11:CD001919. PMC: 8610078. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001919.pub4. View

4.
Maclean N, Pound P . A critical review of the concept of patient motivation in the literature on physical rehabilitation. Soc Sci Med. 2000; 50(4):495-506. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00334-2. View

5.
Oral A, Arman S, Tarakci E, Patrini M, Arienti C, Etemadi Y . A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for persons with osteoarthritis. A "Best Evidence for Rehabilitation" (be4rehab) paper to develop the WHO's Package of Interventions for Rehabilitation: A systematic review of Clinical Practice.... Int J Rheum Dis. 2022; 25(4):383-393. DOI: 10.1111/1756-185X.14292. View