» Articles » PMID: 37280080

Response to Bronchodilators Administered Via Different Nebulizers in Patients With COPD Exacerbation

Overview
Journal Respir Care
Publisher Mary Ann Liebert
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2023 Jun 6
PMID 37280080
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The recommended treatment of COPD exacerbations includes administration of short-acting bronchodilators that act to reverse bronchoconstriction, restore lung volumes, and relieve breathlessness. In vitro studies demonstrate vibrating mesh nebulizers (VMNs) provide greater drug delivery to the airway compared to standard small-volume nebulizers (SVNs). We examined whether the physiological and symptom response to nebulized bronchodilators during a COPD exacerbation differed between these 2 modes of bronchodilator delivery.

Methods: Subjects hospitalized with a COPD exacerbation participated in a comparative clinical effectiveness study of 2 methods of nebulization. Using block randomization, 32 participants in this open-label trial were administered salbutamol 2.5 mg/ipratropium bromide 0.5 mg via vibrating mesh (VMN group, = 16) or small-volume jet nebulizer (SVN group, = 16) on one occasion. Spirometry, body plethysmography, and impulse oscillometry were performed and Borg breathlessness scores recorded pre bronchodilator and at 1 h post bronchodilator.

Results: Baseline demographics were comparable between groups. Mean FEV was 48% predicted. Significant changes in lung volumes and airway impedance were seen in both groups. Inspiratory capacity (IC) increased by 0.27 ± 0.20 L and 0.21 ± 0.20 L in the VMN and SVN group, respectively, between group difference = .40. FVC increased in the VMN group by 0.41 ± 0.40 L compared to 0.19 ± 0.20 L with SVN, between group difference = .053; and residual volume (RV) decreased by 0.36 ± 0.80 L and 0.16 ± 0.50 L in the VMN and SVN group, respectively, between group difference = .41. The VMN group had a significant reduction in Borg breathlessness score, = .034.

Conclusions: Greater improvement in symptoms, and larger absolute change in FVC, was observed in response to equivalent doses of standard bronchodilators administered by VMN, compared to SVN, but no substantial difference in change in IC.

Citing Articles

Comparison of the Application of Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer and Jet Nebulizer in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Feng Z, Han Z, Wang Y, Guo H, Liu J Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024; 19:829-839.

PMID: 38562440 PMC: 10984201. DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S452191.

References
1.
ODonnell D, Lam M, WEBB K . Spirometric correlates of improvement in exercise performance after anticholinergic therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999; 160(2):542-9. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.160.2.9901038. View

2.
Ari A, Dornelas de Andrade A, Sheard M, Alhamad B, Fink J . Performance Comparisons of Jet and Mesh Nebulizers Using Different Interfaces in Simulated Spontaneously Breathing Adults and Children. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2014; 28(4):281-9. DOI: 10.1089/jamp.2014.1149. View

3.
McCrory D, Brown C . Anti-cholinergic bronchodilators versus beta2-sympathomimetic agents for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003; (4):CD003900. PMC: 8753782. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003900. View

4.
Ari A, Areabi H, Fink J . Evaluation of aerosol generator devices at 3 locations in humidified and non-humidified circuits during adult mechanical ventilation. Respir Care. 2010; 55(7):837-44. View

5.
Cushen B, McCormack N, Hennigan K, Sulaiman I, Costello R, Deering B . A pilot study to monitor changes in spirometry and lung volume, following an exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), as part of a supported discharge program. Respir Med. 2016; 119:55-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.08.019. View