» Articles » PMID: 37278426

Sociodemographic Disparities in Ophthalmological Clinical Trials

Abstract

Introduction: In ophthalmology, clinical trials (CTs) guide the treatment of diseases such as diabetic retinopathy, myopia, age-related macular degeneration, glaucoma and keratoconus with distinct presentations, pathological characteristics and responses to treatment in minority populations.Reporting gender and race and ethnicity in healthcare studies is currently recommended by National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines to ensure representativeness and generalisability; however, CT results that include this information have been limited in the past 30 years.The objective of this review is to analyse the sociodemographic disparities in ophthalmological phases III and IV CT based on publicly available data.

Methods: This study included phases III and IV complete ophthalmological CT available from clinicaltrials.org, and describes the country distribution, race and ethnicity description and gender, and funding characteristics.

Results: After a screening process, we included 654 CTs, with findings that corroborate the previous CT reviews' findings that most ophthalmological participants are white and from high-income countries. A description of race and ethnicity is reported in 37.1% of studies but less frequently included within the most studied ophthalmological specialty area (cornea, retina, glaucoma and cataracts). The incidence of race and ethnicity reporting has improved during the past 7 years.

Discussion: Although NIH and FDA promote guidelines to improve generalisability in healthcare studies, the inclusion of race and ethnicity in publications and diverse participants in ophthalmological CT is still limited. Actions from the research community and related stakeholders are necessary to increase representativeness and guarantee generalisability in ophthalmological research results to optimise care and reduce related healthcare disparities.

Citing Articles

Gender and ethnic diversity in randomised clinical trials in age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular oedema.

Ibrahim F, Sivaprasad S, Cheung C Eye (Lond). 2025; .

PMID: 39979609 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-025-03595-7.

References
1.
Burton M, Ramke J, Marques A, Bourne R, Congdon N, Jones I . The Lancet Global Health Commission on Global Eye Health: vision beyond 2020. Lancet Glob Health. 2021; 9(4):e489-e551. PMC: 7966694. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30488-5. View

2.
Umscheid C, Margolis D, Grossman C . Key concepts of clinical trials: a narrative review. Postgrad Med. 2011; 123(5):194-204. PMC: 3272827. DOI: 10.3810/pgm.2011.09.2475. View

3.
Zhang X, Cotch M, Ryskulova A, Primo S, Nair P, Chou C . Vision health disparities in the United States by race/ethnicity, education, and economic status: findings from two nationally representative surveys. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012; 154(6 Suppl):S53-62.e1. PMC: 4169111. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.08.045. View

4.
Mitchell W, Dee E, Celi L . Generalisability through local validation: overcoming barriers due to data disparity in healthcare. BMC Ophthalmol. 2021; 21(1):228. PMC: 8138973. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-021-01992-6. View

5.
Pearson A, Soneji B, Sarvananthan N . Does ethnic origin influence the incidence or severity of keratoconus?. Eye (Lond). 2000; 14 ( Pt 4):625-8. DOI: 10.1038/eye.2000.154. View