» Articles » PMID: 37273280

Eye Movements and ERP Biomarkers for Face Processing Problems in Avoidant Attachment-style Individuals

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2023 Jun 5
PMID 37273280
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Avoidant attachment poses a serious risk to intimate relationships and offspring. However, there are few studies on the face-processing characteristics and impairments of avoidant individuals based on basic emotion theory. Therefore, this study investigated the issues of emotional processing and deactivation strategies in individuals with avoidant attachment.

Methods: Avoidant and secure individuals were recruited to participate in an eye-tracking experiment and a two-choice oddball task in which they had to distinguish facial expressions of basic emotions (sadness, anger, fear, disgust, and neutral). Eye fixation durations to various parts of the face, including the eyes, nose, and mouth, were measured, and three event-related potentials (ERP) components (P100, N170, and P300) were monitored.

Results: Avoidant individuals could not process facial expressions as easily as secure individuals. Avoidant individuals focused less on the eyes of angry faces when compared to secure individuals. They also exhibited a more positive P100 component and a less negative N170 component when processing faces and a larger amplitude of the P300 component than secure individuals when processing emotional expressions.

Conclusion: Avoidant individuals use deactivating strategies and exhibit specific characteristics at different stages, which are of great significance in social interaction.

Citing Articles

Investigating Eye Movements to Examine Attachment-Related Differences in Facial Emotion Perception and Face Memory.

Torok-Suri K, Nemeth K, Baradits M, Csukly G J Imaging. 2025; 11(2).

PMID: 39997562 PMC: 11856241. DOI: 10.3390/jimaging11020060.


Reduced inhibition control ability in children with ADHD due to coexisting learning disorders: an fNIRS study.

Liu F, Chi X, Yu D Front Psychiatry. 2024; 15:1326341.

PMID: 38832323 PMC: 11146205. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1326341.

References
1.
Peltola M, van IJzendoorn M, Yrttiaho S . Attachment security and cortical responses to fearful faces in infants. Attach Hum Dev. 2018; 22(2):174-188. DOI: 10.1080/14616734.2018.1530684. View

2.
Mikulincer M, Shaver P . Attachment orientations and emotion regulation. Curr Opin Psychol. 2018; 25:6-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.02.006. View

3.
Zheng M, Zhang Y, Zheng Y . The effects of attachment avoidance and the defensive regulation of emotional faces: brain potentials examining the role of preemptive and postemptive strategies. Attach Hum Dev. 2015; 17(1):96-110. DOI: 10.1080/14616734.2014.995191. View

4.
Myers L . The importance of the repressive coping style: findings from 30 years of research. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2009; 23(1):3-17. DOI: 10.1080/10615800903366945. View

5.
Momeni K, Amani R, Janjani P, Majzoobi M, Forstmeier S, Nosrati P . Attachment styles and happiness in the elderly: the mediating role of reminiscence styles. BMC Geriatr. 2022; 22(1):349. PMC: 9022404. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03053-z. View