» Articles » PMID: 37273007

Clinical Characteristics, Treatment Outcomes, and Prognosis in Patients with MKIs-associated Hand-foot Skin Reaction: a Retrospective Study

Overview
Specialties Critical Care
Oncology
Date 2023 Jun 5
PMID 37273007
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) treatment has been proven as a powerful strategy in cancer therapy. However, it is greatly hampered by its common adverse effect known as hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR), especially in patients with moderate-to-severe HFSR.

Objective: To investigate the clinical characteristics, histopathological features, treatment response, and bio-indicators of HFSR.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 102 patients with moderate-to-severe HFSR resulting from MKIs therapy.

Results: The median time to development of moderate-to-severe HFSR was 18 days, which would be significantly affected by the type of MKIs and the history of HFSR. Notably, we found that HFSR was classified into three consecutive stages: erythematous lesion, yellow hyperkeratotic lesion with surrounding erythema, and hyperkeratotic lesion. Inflammation was observed in the first two stages of HFSR, but disappeared in the third stage; in contrast, the hyperkeratosis gradually became thicker from stage one to stage three. Moreover, topical medications were demonstrated as an effective therapy for HFSR, among which, the topical steroids and urea ointment treatment response rate was 37.14%, the Shouzu Ning Decoction (SND) treatment response rate was 65%, and the SND in combination with urea ointment treatment response rate was 75%, meanwhile, systemic therapies did not improve the therapeutic efficacy of topical medications alone. In addition, the serum levels of HMGB1 were found to be a potential indicator for tracking the healing process as well as predicting the prognosis of HFSR.

Conclusion: This study revealed the potential factors affecting the development of HFSR, evaluated the therapeutic response towards different strategies for treating HFSR, and identified a potential prognostic indicator of HFSR.

References
1.
Yang J, Yan J, Liu B . Targeting VEGF/VEGFR to Modulate Antitumor Immunity. Front Immunol. 2018; 9:978. PMC: 5943566. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00978. View

2.
Liu G, Chen T, Ding Z, Wang Y, Wei Y, Wei X . Inhibition of FGF-FGFR and VEGF-VEGFR signalling in cancer treatment. Cell Prolif. 2021; 54(4):e13009. PMC: 8016646. DOI: 10.1111/cpr.13009. View

3.
Jayson G, Kerbel R, Ellis L, Harris A . Antiangiogenic therapy in oncology: current status and future directions. Lancet. 2016; 388(10043):518-29. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01088-0. View

4.
Ding F, Liu B, Wang Y . Risk of hand-foot skin reaction associated with vascular endothelial growth factor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors: A meta-analysis of 57 randomized controlled trials involving 24,956 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019; 83(3):788-796. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.04.021. View

5.
Freites-Martinez A, Santana N, Arias-Santiago S, Viera A . Using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE - Version 5.0) to Evaluate the Severity of Adverse Events of Anticancer Therapies. Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed). 2020; 112(1):90-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.ad.2019.05.009. View