» Articles » PMID: 37271061

The Effects of Socioeconomic Status on Working Memory in Childhood Are Partially Mediated by Intersensory Processing of Audiovisual Events in Infancy

Overview
Date 2023 Jun 4
PMID 37271061
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Socioeconomic status (SES) is a well-established predictor of individual differences in childhood language and cognitive functioning, including executive functions such as working memory. In infancy, intersensory processing-selectively attending to properties of events that are redundantly specified across the senses at the expense of non-redundant, irrelevant properties-also predicts language development. Our recent research demonstrates that individual differences in intersensory processing in infancy predict a variety of language outcomes in childhood, even after controlling for SES. However, relations among intersensory processing and cognitive outcomes such as working memory have not yet been investigated. Thus, the present study examines relations between intersensory processing in infancy and working memory in early childhood, and the role of SES in this relation. Children (N = 101) received the Multisensory Attention Assessment Protocol at 12-months to assess intersensory processing (face-voice and object-sound matching) and received the WPPSI at 36-months to assess working memory. SES was indexed by maternal education, paternal education, and income. A variety of novel findings emerged. 1) Individual differences in intersensory processing at 12-months predicted working memory at 36-months of age even after controlling for SES. 2) Individual differences in SES predicted intersensory processing at 12-months of age. 3) The well-established relation between SES and working memory was partially mediated by intersensory processing. Children from families of higher-SES have better intersensory processing skills at 12-months and this combination of factors predicts greater working memory two years later at 36-months. Together these findings reveal the role of intersensory processing in cognitive functioning.

Citing Articles

Building language learning: Relations between infant attention and social contingency in the first year of life.

Masek L, Edgar E, McMillan B, Todd J, Golinkoff R, Bahrick L Infant Behav Dev. 2024; 75:101933.

PMID: 38507845 PMC: 11162929. DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2024.101933.

References
1.
Rose S, Feldman J, Jankowski J . Modeling a cascade of effects: the role of speed and executive functioning in preterm/full-term differences in academic achievement. Dev Sci. 2011; 14(5):1161-75. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01068.x. View

2.
Engle R, Tuholski S, Laughlin J, Conway A . Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1999; 128(3):309-331. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.128.3.309. View

3.
Bahrick L, Walker A, Neisser U . Selective looking by infants. Cogn Psychol. 1981; 13(3):377-90. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(81)90014-1. View

4.
Carlson S . Developmentally sensitive measures of executive function in preschool children. Dev Neuropsychol. 2005; 28(2):595-616. DOI: 10.1207/s15326942dn2802_3. View

5.
Reynolds G, Romano A . The Development of Attention Systems and Working Memory in Infancy. Front Syst Neurosci. 2016; 10:15. PMC: 4776056. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2016.00015. View