» Articles » PMID: 37268840

An AI-Based Image Quality Control Framework for Knee Radiographs

Overview
Journal J Digit Imaging
Publisher Springer
Date 2023 Jun 2
PMID 37268840
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Image quality control (QC) is crucial for the accurate diagnosis of knee diseases using radiographs. However, the manual QC process is subjective, labor intensive, and time-consuming. In this study, we aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model to automate the QC procedure typically performed by clinicians. We proposed an AI-based fully automatic QC model for knee radiographs using high-resolution net (HR-Net) to identify predefined key points in images. We then performed geometric calculations to transform the identified key points into three QC criteria, namely, anteroposterior (AP)/lateral (LAT) overlap ratios and LAT flexion angle. The proposed model was trained and validated using 2212 knee plain radiographs from 1208 patients and an additional 1572 knee radiographs from 753 patients collected from six external centers for further external validation. For the internal validation cohort, the proposed AI model and clinicians showed high intraclass consistency coefficients (ICCs) for AP/LAT fibular head overlap and LAT knee flexion angle of 0.952, 0.895, and 0.993, respectively. For the external validation cohort, the ICCs were also high, with values of 0.934, 0.856, and 0.991, respectively. There were no significant differences between the AI model and clinicians in any of the three QC criteria, and the AI model required significantly less measurement time than clinicians. The experimental results demonstrated that the AI model performed comparably to clinicians and required less time. Therefore, the proposed AI-based model has great potential as a convenient tool for clinical practice by automating the QC procedure for knee radiographs.

Citing Articles

Quality control of elbow joint radiography using a YOLOv8-based artificial intelligence technology.

Lai Q, Chen W, Ding X, Huang X, Jiang W, Zhang L Eur Radiol Exp. 2024; 8(1):107.

PMID: 39302546 PMC: 11415556. DOI: 10.1186/s41747-024-00504-7.


Fostering Excellence in Knee Arthroplasty: Developing Optimal Patient Care Pathways and Inspiring Knowledge Transfer of Advanced Surgical Techniques.

Migliorini F, Feierabend M, Hofmann U J Healthc Leadersh. 2023; 15:327-338.

PMID: 38020721 PMC: 10676205. DOI: 10.2147/JHL.S383916.

References
1.
Zlotnicki J, Naendrup J, Ferrer G, Debski R . Basic biomechanic principles of knee instability. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016; 9(2):114-22. PMC: 4896872. DOI: 10.1007/s12178-016-9329-8. View

2.
Kong A, Robbins R, Stensby J, Wissman R . The Lateral Knee Radiograph: A Detailed Review. J Knee Surg. 2022; 35(5):482-490. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1741391. View

3.
Mazzuca S, Brandt K, Katz B . Is conventional radiography suitable for evaluation of a disease-modifying drug in patients with knee osteoarthritis?. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1997; 5(4):217-26. DOI: 10.1016/s1063-4584(97)80017-9. View

4.
Kohn M, Sassoon A, Fernando N . Classifications in Brief: Kellgren-Lawrence Classification of Osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016; 474(8):1886-93. PMC: 4925407. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-4732-4. View

5.
Kellgren J, Lawrence J . Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957; 16(4):494-502. PMC: 1006995. DOI: 10.1136/ard.16.4.494. View