» Articles » PMID: 37265954

Urban Cultural Heritage is Mentally Restorative: an Experimental Study Based on Multiple Psychophysiological Measures

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2023 Jun 2
PMID 37265954
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Urban cultural heritage sites bear the cultural functions of a city, hold spiritual and cultural value, can recall emotional memories, and serve the cultural leisure activities of the residents. Urban cultural heritage sites can help citizens perceive a sense of belonging and a feeling of relaxation, but whether and to what extent cultural heritage sites affect mental health remains unknown.

Methods: Based on attention restoration theory, multiple research methods are adopted in this study to examine the impact of cultural heritage on human restorative mechanisms. Five representative cultural heritage sites from the cultural heritage-rich city of Xi'an are selected as the research object. In addition, a questionnaire survey and physiological experiments are conducted. Perceived restorative scale, skin conductance response, heart rate variability, and eye movement data while viewing photographs of the cases are collected from the participants.

Results: Results show that cultural heritage sites have psychophysiological restorative effects, which are especially significant in the fascination dimension. Moreover, historical buildings can promote the restorative effects of cultural heritage sites.

Discussion: This finding may lead to new conservation and innovation planning strategies considering the mental health effects of cultural heritage.

Citing Articles

The influence of architectural heritage and tourists' positive emotions on behavioral intentions using eye-tracking study.

Li X, Wang P, Li L, Liu J Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):1447.

PMID: 39789079 PMC: 11717946. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-85009-4.


Exploring the restorative benefits of work in smart working structures on vacations in small villages.

Maffei L, Ciervo A, Marzocchi R, Masullo M Front Psychol. 2024; 14:1232318.

PMID: 38173859 PMC: 10763249. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1232318.

References
1.
Tieskens K, Smith I, Jimenez R, Hutyra L, Fabian M . Mapping the gaps between cooling benefits of urban greenspace and population heat vulnerability. Sci Total Environ. 2022; 845:157283. PMC: 11767550. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157283. View

2.
Cervera M, Bell S, Munoz F, Mishra H, Fleming L, Grellier J . A Transdisciplinary Approach to Recovering Natural and Cultural Landscape and Place Identification: A Case Study of Can Moritz Spring (Rubí, Spain). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(4). PMC: 7916719. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18041709. View

3.
Twedt E, Rainey R, Proffitt D . Designed Natural Spaces: Informal Gardens Are Perceived to Be More Restorative than Formal Gardens. Front Psychol. 2016; 7:88. PMC: 4749713. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00088. View

4.
Stigsdotter U, Corazon S, Sidenius U, Kristiansen J, Grahn P . It is not all bad for the grey city - A crossover study on physiological and psychological restoration in a forest and an urban environment. Health Place. 2017; 46:145-154. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.05.007. View

5.
Bornioli A, Parkhurst G, Morgan P . The psychological wellbeing benefits of place engagement during walking in urban environments: A qualitative photo-elicitation study. Health Place. 2018; 53:228-236. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.08.018. View