» Articles » PMID: 37264725

Copy Number Variants and Fetal Structural Abnormalities in Stillborn Fetuses: A Secondary Analysis of the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network Study

Abstract

Objective: To examine the association of placental and fetal DNA copy number variants (CNVs) with fetal structural malformations (FSMs) in stillborn fetuses.

Design: A secondary analysis of stillbirth cases in the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network (SCRN) study.

Setting: Multicenter, 59 hospitals in five geographic regions in the USA.

Population: 388 stillbirth cases of the SCRN study (2006-2008).

Methods: Fetal structural malformations were grouped by anatomic system and specific malformation type (e.g. central nervous system, thoracic, cardiac, gastrointestinal, skeletal, umbilical cord and craniofacial defects). Single-nucleotide polymorphism array detected CNVs of at least 500 kb. CNVs were classified into two groups: normal, defined as no CNVs >500 kb or benign CNVs, and abnormal, defined as pathogenic or variants of unknown clinical significance.

Main Outcome Measures: The proportions of abnormal CNVs and normal CNVs were compared between stillbirth cases with and without FSMs using the Wald Chi-square test.

Results: The proportion of stillbirth cases with any FSMs was higher among those with abnormal CNVs than among those with normal CNVs (47.5 versus 19.1%; P-value <0.001). The most common organ system-specific FSMs associated with abnormal CNVs were cardiac defects, followed by hydrops, craniofacial defects and skeletal defects. A pathogenic deletion of 1q21.1 involving 46 genes (e.g. CHD1L) and a duplication of 21q22.13 involving four genes (SIM2, CLDN14, CHAF1B, HLCS) were associated with a skeletal and cardiac defect, respectively.

Conclusion: Specific CNVs involving several genes were associated with FSMs in stillborn fetuses. The findings warrant further investigation and may inform counselling and care surrounding pregnancies affected by FSMs at risk for stillbirth.

Citing Articles

Concordance and pathogenicity of copy number variants detected by non-invasive prenatal screening in 38,611 pregnant women without fetal structural abnormalities.

Liu Y, Wang J, Wang L, Chen L, Xie D, Wang L Chin Med J (Engl). 2025; 138(4):499-501.

PMID: 39820083 PMC: 11845209. DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003449.


Factors Contributing to Uptake of Stillbirth Evaluations: A Qualitative Analysis.

Riches N, Workalemahu T, Johnson E, Lopez S, Blue N, Page J BJOG. 2024; 132(5):606-613.

PMID: 39648790 PMC: 11879755. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.18038.

References
1.
. Causes of death among stillbirths. JAMA. 2011; 306(22):2459-68. PMC: 4562291. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.1823. View

2.
Kirov G, Rees E, Walters J, Escott-Price V, Georgieva L, Richards A . The penetrance of copy number variations for schizophrenia and developmental delay. Biol Psychiatry. 2013; 75(5):378-85. PMC: 4229045. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.07.022. View

3.
Parker C, Hogue C, Koch M, Willinger M, Reddy U, Thorsten V . Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network: design, methods and recruitment experience. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2011; 25(5):425-35. PMC: 3665402. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2011.01218.x. View

4.
Nowakowska B . Clinical interpretation of copy number variants in the human genome. J Appl Genet. 2017; 58(4):449-457. PMC: 5655614. DOI: 10.1007/s13353-017-0407-4. View

5.
Reddy U, Page G, Saade G, Silver R, Thorsten V, Parker C . Karyotype versus microarray testing for genetic abnormalities after stillbirth. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367(23):2185-93. PMC: 4295117. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1201569. View