» Articles » PMID: 37261544

Hydrogel Capsule-based Digital Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction

Overview
Journal Mikrochim Acta
Specialties Biotechnology
Chemistry
Date 2023 Jun 1
PMID 37261544
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is accurate in nucleic acid quantification owing to its linearity and high sensitivity. Amplification of nucleic acid in droplets, however, is limited by the stability of droplets against thermal cycling. While the use of fluorinated oil or supplementation of surfactant could improve the stability of droplets, this process has also greatly increased the cost of ddPCR and limited post-PCR analysis. Here, we report a novel method known as gel capsule-based digital PCR (gc-dPCR) which includes a method to prepare hydrogel capsules encapsulating the PCR reaction mix, conducting PCR reaction, and readout by either quantitative PCR (qPCR) system or fluorescence microplate reader. We have compared the developed method to vortex ddPCR. Our approach results in higher fluorescence intensity compared to ddPCR suggesting higher sensitivity of the system. As hydrogel capsules are more stable than droplets in fluorinated oil throughout thermal cycling, all partitions can be quantified, thus preventing loss of information from low-concentration samples. The new approach should extend to all droplet-based PCR methods. It has greatly improved ddPCR by increasing droplets stability and sensitivity, and reducing the cost of ddPCR, which help to remove the barrier of ddPCR in settings with limited resources.

Citing Articles

Improvement of Sensitivity and Speed of Virus Sensing Technologies Using nm- and μm-Scale Components.

Yasuura M, Tan Z, Horiguchi Y, Ashiba H, Fukuda T Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(15).

PMID: 37571612 PMC: 10422600. DOI: 10.3390/s23156830.

References
1.
Pavsic J, Zel J, Milavec M . Digital PCR for direct quantification of viruses without DNA extraction. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2015; 408(1):67-75. PMC: 4706837. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-015-9109-0. View

2.
Han J, Lee J, Bae Y . Application of digital PCR for assessing DNA fragmentation in cytotoxicity response. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 2019; 1863(8):1235-1242. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2019.05.001. View

3.
Sun C, Liu L, Vasudevan H, Chang K, Abate A . Accurate Bulk Quantitation of Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction. Anal Chem. 2021; 93(29):9974-9979. PMC: 8829825. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c00877. View

4.
Vogelstein B, Kinzler K . Digital PCR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96(16):9236-41. PMC: 17763. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.16.9236. View

5.
Morch Y, Donati I, Strand B, Skjak-Braek G . Effect of Ca2+, Ba2+, and Sr2+ on alginate microbeads. Biomacromolecules. 2006; 7(5):1471-80. DOI: 10.1021/bm060010d. View