» Articles » PMID: 37259142

Muscle Synergy Patterns As Altered Coordination Strategies in Individuals with Chronic Low Back Pain: a Cross-sectional Study

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a highly prevalent disease with poorly understood underlying mechanisms. In particular, altered trunk muscle coordination in response to specific trunk tasks remains largely unknown.

Methods: We investigated the muscle synergies during 11 trunk movement and stability tasks in 15 healthy individuals (8 females and 7 males, aged 21. 3 (20.1-22.8) ± 0.6 years) and in 15 CLBP participants (8 females and 7 males, aged 20. 9 (20.2-22.6) ± 0.7 years) by recording the surface electromyographic activities of 12 back and abdominal muscles (six muscles unilaterally). Non-negative matrix factorization was performed to extract the muscle synergies.

Results: We found six trunk muscle synergies and temporal patterns in both groups. The high similarity of the trunk synergies and temporal patterns in the groups suggests that both groups share the common feature of the trunk coordination strategy. We also found that trunk synergies related to the lumbar erector spinae showed lower variability in the CLBP group. This may reflect the impaired back muscles that reshape the trunk synergies in the fixed structure of CLBP. Furthermore, the higher variability of trunk synergies in the other muscle regions such as in the latissimus dorsi and oblique externus, which were activated in trunk stability tasks in the CLBP group, represented more individual motor strategies when the trunk tasks were highly demanding.

Conclusion: Our work provides the first demonstration that individual modular organization is fine-tuned while preserving the overall structures of trunk synergies and temporal patterns in the presence of persistent CLBP.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of the trunk modules in the symmetrical and three-dimensional asymmetrical trunk positions.

Kian-Bostanabad S, Azghani M, Parnianpour M Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):7718.

PMID: 40044704 PMC: 11882977. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87802-1.


Coordination and variability of muscular activation in male athletes with and without subacromial impingement syndrome: A case-control study.

Sheikhhoseini R, Abdollahi S, Salsali M, Anbarian M, Guess T PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0319048.

PMID: 40009610 PMC: 11864556. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319048.


Structural and Organizational Strategies of Locomotor Modules during Landing in Patients with Chronic Ankle Instability.

Jie T, Xu D, Zhang Z, Teo E, Baker J, Zhou H Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(5).

PMID: 38790384 PMC: 11117571. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11050518.


Correction to: Muscle synergy patterns as altered coordination strategies in individuals with chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional study.

Saito H, Yokoyama H, Sasaki A, Nakazawa K J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023; 20(1):89.

PMID: 37452353 PMC: 10349502. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-023-01210-y.

References
1.
Latash M . The bliss (not the problem) of motor abundance (not redundancy). Exp Brain Res. 2012; 217(1):1-5. PMC: 3532046. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3000-4. View

2.
Kristiansen M, Madeleine P, Hansen E, Samani A . Inter-subject variability of muscle synergies during bench press in power lifters and untrained individuals. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013; 25(1):89-97. DOI: 10.1111/sms.12167. View

3.
Cheung V, Cheung B, Zhang J, Chan Z, Ha S, Chen C . Plasticity of muscle synergies through fractionation and merging during development and training of human runners. Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1):4356. PMC: 7459346. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-18210-4. View

4.
Cheung V, dAvella A, Tresch M, Bizzi E . Central and sensory contributions to the activation and organization of muscle synergies during natural motor behaviors. J Neurosci. 2005; 25(27):6419-34. PMC: 6725265. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4904-04.2005. View

5.
. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017; 390(10100):1211-1259. PMC: 5605509. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2. View