» Articles » PMID: 37257922

A Natural Language Processing Approach to Categorise Contributing Factors from Patient Safety Event Reports

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to explore the use of natural language processing (NLP) algorithm to categorise contributing factors from patient safety event (PSE). Contributing factors are elements in the healthcare process (eg, communication failures) that instigate an event or allow an event to occur. Contributing factors can be used to further investigate why safety events occurred.

Methods: We used 10 years of self-reported PSE reports from a multihospital healthcare system in the USA. Reports were first selected by event date. We calculated χ values for each ngram in the bag-of-words then selected N ngrams with the highest χ values. Then, PSE reports were filtered to only include the sentences containing the selected ngrams. Such sentences were called information-rich sentences. We compared two feature extraction techniques from free-text data: (1) baseline bag-of-words features and (2) features from information-rich sentences. Three machine learning algorithms were used to categorise five contributing factors representing sociotechnical errors: communication/hand-off failure, technology issue, policy/procedure issue, distractions/interruptions and lapse/slip. We trained 15 binary classifiers (five contributing factors * three machine learning models). The models' performances were evaluated according to the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), precision, recall, and F1-score.

Results: Applying the information-rich sentence selection algorithm boosted the contributing factor categorisation performance. Comparing the AUPRCs, the proposed NLP approach improved the categorisation performance of two and achieved comparable results with baseline in categorising three contributing factors.

Conclusions: Information-rich sentence selection can be incorporated to extract the sentences in free-text event narratives in which the contributing factor information is embedded.

Citing Articles

Co-producing a safe mobility and falls informatics platform to drive meaningful quality improvement in the hospital setting: a mixed-methods protocol for the study.

Lear R, Averill P, Carenzo C, Tao R, Glampson B, Leon-Villapalos C BMJ Open. 2025; 15(2):e082053.

PMID: 39900411 PMC: 11795406. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082053.


Evaluation of a Natural Language Processing Approach to Identify Diagnostic Errors and Analysis of Safety Learning System Case Review Data: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Tabaie A, Tran A, Calabria T, Bennett S, Milicia A, Weintraub W J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e50935.

PMID: 39186764 PMC: 11384169. DOI: 10.2196/50935.


Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Opportunities come with landmines.

Iqbal U, Hsu Y, Celi L, Li Y BMJ Health Care Inform. 2024; 31(1).

PMID: 38839426 PMC: 11163668. DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101086.


Risk Management and Patient Safety in the Artificial Intelligence Era: A Systematic Review.

Ferrara M, Bertozzi G, Di Fazio N, Aquila I, Di Fazio A, Maiese A Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(5).

PMID: 38470660 PMC: 10931321. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12050549.

References
1.
Pfob A, Sidey-Gibbons C, Lee H, Tasoulis M, Koelbel V, Golatta M . Identification of breast cancer patients with pathologic complete response in the breast after neoadjuvant systemic treatment by an intelligent vacuum-assisted biopsy. Eur J Cancer. 2020; 143:134-146. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.11.006. View

2.
Holden R, Carayon P, Gurses A, Hoonakker P, Hundt A, Ozok A . SEIPS 2.0: a human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients. Ergonomics. 2013; 56(11):1669-86. PMC: 3835697. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2013.838643. View

3.
Archer S, Hull L, Soukup T, Mayer E, Athanasiou T, Sevdalis N . Development of a theoretical framework of factors affecting patient safety incident reporting: a theoretical review of the literature. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(12):e017155. PMC: 5770969. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017155. View

4.
Flynn E, Barker K, Pepper G, Bates D, Mikeal R . Comparison of methods for detecting medication errors in 36 hospitals and skilled-nursing facilities. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2002; 59(5):436-46. DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/59.5.436. View

5.
Tabaie A, Orenstein E, Nemati S, Basu R, Kandaswamy S, Clifford G . Predicting presumed serious infection among hospitalized children on central venous lines with machine learning. Comput Biol Med. 2021; 132:104289. PMC: 9207586. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104289. View