» Articles » PMID: 37256675

Use of Elastomeric Half-Mask Respirator in the Clinical Care Environment: Health Care Worker Perceptions

Overview
Specialty Nursing
Date 2023 May 31
PMID 37256675
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Elastomeric half-mask respirators (EHMR) reduce health care workers' exposure to airborne hazards including bioaerosols but have primarily been used in the industrial setting.

Purpose: To assess health care workers' perceptions, attitudes, and experiences wearing EHMRs in a clinical environment.

Methods: Employees within a single health care system who wore the EHMR continuously during their shift completed an investigator developed survey. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used.

Results: Of the 8273 EHMR "fit-tested" eligible employees, 1478 met inclusion criteria and participated. Respondents reported that they felt well protected with the EHMR and confident in their care and maintenance of the EHMR. Although skin changes developed, they were primarily managed by adjusting the straps. Clarity of communication was a concern across all respondents and disciplines.

Conclusions: The EHMR was preferred over reusing the N95 although clarity in communication was challenging.

Citing Articles

Streamlining Regulatory Oversight of Respirators Used in Health Care Settings Will Improve Worker Protection.

Cummings K, Prezant D, Shirley M, McDiarmid M NAM Perspect. 2025; 2024.

PMID: 39830808 PMC: 11741533. DOI: 10.31478/202405a.


Experiences when using different EHMR models: Implications for different designs and meeting user expectations.

Haas E, Edirisooriya M, Fernando R, McClain C, Sietsema M, Hornbeck A Am J Infect Control. 2024; 53(1):144-149.

PMID: 39191352 PMC: 11891883. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2024.08.019.

References
1.
LaVela S, Kostovich C, Locatelli S, Gosch M, Eagan A, Radonovich L . Development and initial validation of the Respirator Comfort, Wearing Experience, and Function Instrument [R-COMFI]. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2016; 14(2):135-147. DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2016.1237025. View

2.
Round M, Isherwood P . Speech intelligibility in respiratory protective equipment - Implications for verbal communication in critical care. Trends Anaesth Crit Care. 2024; 36:23-29. PMC: 7428718. DOI: 10.1016/j.tacc.2020.08.006. View

3.
Nichol K, McGeer A, Bigelow P, OBrien-Pallas L, Scott J, Holness D . Behind the mask: Determinants of nurse's adherence to facial protective equipment. Am J Infect Control. 2012; 41(1):8-13. PMC: 7132700. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.12.018. View

4.
Hu K, Fan J, Li X, Gou X, Li X, Zhou X . The adverse skin reactions of health care workers using personal protective equipment for COVID-19. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020; 99(24):e20603. PMC: 7302613. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020603. View

5.
Doyle L, McCabe C, Keogh B, Brady A, McCann M . An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research. J Res Nurs. 2021; 25(5):443-455. PMC: 7932381. DOI: 10.1177/1744987119880234. View