» Articles » PMID: 37244891

Memory, Perceptual, and Motor Costs Affect the Strength of Categorical Encoding During Motor Learning of Object Properties

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2023 May 27
PMID 37244891
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Nearly all tasks of daily life involve skilled object manipulation, and successful manipulation requires knowledge of object dynamics. We recently developed a motor learning paradigm that reveals the categorical organization of motor memories of object dynamics. When participants repeatedly lift a constant-density "family" of cylindrical objects that vary in size, and then an outlier object with a greater density is interleaved into the sequence of lifts, they often fail to learn the weight of the outlier, persistently treating it as a family member despite repeated errors. Here we examine eight factors (Similarity, Cardinality, Frequency, History, Structure, Stochasticity, Persistence, and Time Pressure) that could influence the formation and retrieval of category representations in the outlier paradigm. In our web-based task, participants (N = 240) anticipated object weights by stretching a virtual spring attached to the top of each object. Using Bayesian t-tests, we analyze the relative impact of each manipulated factor on categorical encoding (strengthen, weaken, or no effect). Our results suggest that category representations of object weight are automatic, rigid, and linear and, as a consequence, the key determinant of whether an outlier is encoded as a member of the family is its discriminability from the family members.

Citing Articles

Adaptation of the gain of the corrective lifting response in object manipulation transfers across the hand.

McGarity-Shipley M, Gallivan J, Flanagan J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):17301.

PMID: 39068196 PMC: 11283509. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-66184-w.


Ouvrai opens access to remote virtual reality studies of human behavioural neuroscience.

Cesanek E, Shivkumar S, Ingram J, Wolpert D Nat Hum Behav. 2024; 8(6):1209-1224.

PMID: 38671286 PMC: 11199109. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-01834-7.

References
1.
Diedrichsen J, Kornysheva K . Motor skill learning between selection and execution. Trends Cogn Sci. 2015; 19(4):227-33. PMC: 5617110. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.02.003. View

2.
Howard I, Ingram J, Wolpert D . Composition and decomposition in bimanual dynamic learning. J Neurosci. 2008; 28(42):10531-40. PMC: 2637175. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3473-08.2008. View

3.
Ranganathan R, Tomlinson A, Lokesh R, Lin T, Patel P . A tale of too many tasks: task fragmentation in motor learning and a call for model task paradigms. Exp Brain Res. 2020; 239(1):1-19. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-05908-6. View

4.
Minda J, Smith J . Prototypes in category learning: the effects of category size, category structure, and stimulus complexity. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001; 27(3):775-99. View

5.
Bonstrup M, Iturrate I, Hebart M, Censor N, Cohen L . Mechanisms of offline motor learning at a microscale of seconds in large-scale crowdsourced data. NPJ Sci Learn. 2020; 5:7. PMC: 7272649. DOI: 10.1038/s41539-020-0066-9. View