» Articles » PMID: 37243849

Perceived Economic Pressure and Colorectal Cancer-related Perceptions Among U.S. Males (aged 45-75)

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Public Health
Date 2023 May 27
PMID 37243849
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To examine whether a greater perception of economic pressure would be associated with more-negative attitudes, greater perceived barriers, and lower subjective norms regarding colorectal cancer (CRC) and CRC screening among males aged 45-75 years.

Methods: We recruited 492 self-identified males aged 45-75 years living in the United States. We operationalized perceived economic pressure as a latent factor with three subscales: can't make ends meet, unmet material needs, and financial cutbacks. Our dependent variables were attitudes toward CRC and CRC screening, perceived barriers to completing a CRC screening exam, and subjective norms regarding CRC screening (e.g., how others value CRC screening). We tested a hypothesized model using structural equation modeling with maximum-likelihood estimation, adjusting for covariates, and made post-hoc modifications to improve model fit.

Results: Greater perceived economic pressure was associated with more-negative attitudes toward CRC and CRC screening (β = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.37,0.57) and with greater perceived barriers to CRC screening (β = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.34), but was not significantly associated with subjective norms (β = 0.07, 95% CI: - 0.05, 0.19). Perceived economic pressure was an indirect pathway by which lower-income and younger age were associated with more-negative attitudes and greater perceived barriers.

Conclusions: Our study is one of the first to show that, among males, perceived economic pressure is associated with two social-cognitive mechanisms (i.e., negative attitudes, greater perceived barriers) that are known to influence CRC screening intent and, ultimately, CRC screening completion. Future research on this topic should employ longitudinal study designs.

Citing Articles

Status quo and factors of depression and anxiety in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer after plasma electrocision.

Lu B, Ding M, Xu H, Yan C World J Psychiatry. 2024; 14(6):822-828.

PMID: 38984328 PMC: 11230096. DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i6.822.


Association between Socioecological Status, Nutrient Intake, and Cancer Screening Behaviors in Adults Aged 40 and Over: Insights from the Eighth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES, 2019).

Jeong S, Choi Y Nutrients. 2024; 16(7).

PMID: 38613081 PMC: 11013844. DOI: 10.3390/nu16071048.

References
1.
Kiviniemi M, Bennett A, Zaiter M, Marshall J . Individual-level factors in colorectal cancer screening: a review of the literature on the relation of individual-level health behavior constructs and screening behavior. Psychooncology. 2011; 20(10):1023-33. PMC: 3038178. DOI: 10.1002/pon.1865. View

2.
Andersen S, Blot W, Lipworth L, Steinwandel M, Murff H, Zheng W . Association of Race and Socioeconomic Status With Colorectal Cancer Screening, Colorectal Cancer Risk, and Mortality in Southern US Adults. JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2(12):e1917995. PMC: 6991213. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17995. View

3.
Pruitt S, Shim M, Mullen P, Vernon S, Amick 3rd B . Association of area socioeconomic status and breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009; 18(10):2579-99. PMC: 2760038. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0135. View

4.
Muthukrishnan M, Arnold L, James A . Patients' self-reported barriers to colon cancer screening in federally qualified health center settings. Prev Med Rep. 2019; 15:100896. PMC: 6531912. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100896. View

5.
Hagger M, Hamilton K . Effects of socio-structural variables in the theory of planned behavior: a mediation model in multiple samples and behaviors. Psychol Health. 2020; 36(3):307-333. DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2020.1784420. View