» Articles » PMID: 37242526

Use Pattern of Ophthalmic Antiglaucoma Agents with and Without Preservatives: A Cross-Sectional Study

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2023 May 27
PMID 37242526
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Different drugs have been approved to reduce the intraocular pressure. However, most of them contain preservatives to maintain sterility and these can be toxic to the ocular surface. The aim was to determine the patterns of use of antiglaucoma agents and ophthalmic preservatives in a group of patients from Colombia.

Methods: A cross-sectional study that identified ophthalmic antiglaucoma agents from a population database of 9.2 million. Sociodemographic and pharmacological variables were considered. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were performed.

Results: A total of 38,262 patients were identified, with a mean age of 69.2 ± 13.3 years, and 58.6% were women. A total of 98.8% were prescribed antiglaucoma drugs in multidose containers. The most widely used were prostaglandin analogs (59.9%), especially latanoprost (51.6%) and β-blockers (59.2%). A total of 54.7% of patients received combined management, especially with fixed-dose combination (FDC) drugs (41.3%). A total of 94.1% used antiglaucoma drugs with preservatives (benzalkonium chloride, 68.4%).

Conclusions: The pharmacological treatment of glaucoma was very heterogeneous, but the most commonly used therapeutic groups were in accordance with the recommendations of clinical practice guidelines but with differences by sex and age. Most of the patients were exposed to preservatives, especially benzalkonium chloride, but the wide use of FDC drugs can minimize toxicity on the ocular surface.

Citing Articles

Research progress of corneal characteristics and changes in primary angle‑closure glaucoma (Review).

Wang Y, Yan L, Qin Y, Fan F Biomed Rep. 2025; 22(4):59.

PMID: 39991004 PMC: 11843189. DOI: 10.3892/br.2025.1937.

References
1.
Schwartz G, Patel A, Naik R, Lunacsek O, Ogbonnaya A, Campbell J . Characteristics and Treatment Patterns of Newly Diagnosed Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients in the United States: An Administrative Database Analysis. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2020; 4(2):117-125. DOI: 10.1016/j.ogla.2020.09.002. View

2.
Fujita A, Hashimoto Y, Matsui H, Yasunaga H, Aihara M . Recent Trends in Treatment and Associated Costs of Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2022; 6(3):308-315. DOI: 10.1016/j.ogla.2022.10.002. View

3.
Yan J, Xiong X, Shen J, Huang T . The use of fixed dose drug combinations for glaucoma in clinical settings: a retrospective, observational, single-centre study. Int Ophthalmol. 2021; 42(3):945-950. DOI: 10.1007/s10792-021-02076-6. View

4.
Lin J . The use of ocular hypotensive drugs for glaucoma treatment: changing trend in Taiwan from 1997 to 2007. J Glaucoma. 2015; 24(5):364-71. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31829ea2e6. View

5.
Wagner I, Stewart M, Dorairaj S . Updates on the Diagnosis and Management of Glaucoma. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2022; 6(6):618-635. PMC: 9673042. DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2022.09.007. View