» Articles » PMID: 37239306

Different Types of Survey-Based Environmental Representations: Egocentric Vs. Allocentric Cognitive Maps

Overview
Journal Brain Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 May 27
PMID 37239306
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The goal of the current study was to show the existence of distinct types of survey-based environmental representations, egocentric and allocentric, and provide experimental evidence that they are formed by different types of navigational strategies, path integration and map-based navigation, respectively. After traversing an unfamiliar route, participants were either disoriented and asked to point to non-visible landmarks encountered on the route (Experiment 1) or presented with a secondary spatial working memory task while determining the spatial locations of objects on the route (Experiment 2). The results demonstrate a double dissociation between the navigational strategies underlying the formation of allocentric and egocentric survey-based representation. Specifically, only the individuals who generated egocentric survey-based representations of the route were affected by disorientation, suggesting they relied primarily on a path integration strategy combined with landmark/scene processing at each route segment. In contrast, only allocentric-survey mappers were affected by the secondary spatial working memory task, suggesting their use of map-based navigation. This research is the first to show that path integration, in conjunction with egocentric landmark processing, is a distinct standalone navigational strategy underpinning the formation of a unique type of environmental representation-the egocentric survey-based representation.

Citing Articles

The Contribution of Internal and External Factors to Human Spatial Navigation.

Piccardi L, Nori R, Cimadevilla J, Kozhevnikov M Brain Sci. 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38928585 PMC: 11201702. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14060585.

References
1.
Mou W, McNamara T . Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002; 28(1):162-70. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.28.1.162. View

2.
Foo P, Warren W, Duchon A, Tarr M . Do humans integrate routes into a cognitive map? Map- versus landmark-based navigation of novel shortcuts. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005; 31(2):195-215. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.2.195. View

3.
Burgess N . Spatial cognition and the brain. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008; 1124:77-97. DOI: 10.1196/annals.1440.002. View

4.
Wang R, Spelke E . Human spatial representation: insights from animals. Trends Cogn Sci. 2002; 6(9):376. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(02)01961-7. View

5.
Burgess N, Barry C, OKeefe J . An oscillatory interference model of grid cell firing. Hippocampus. 2007; 17(9):801-12. PMC: 2678278. DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20327. View