» Articles » PMID: 37238265

The Potential Role of Neutrophil-Reactive Intensity (NEUT-RI) in the Diagnosis of Sepsis in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract

The diagnosis of sepsis is often difficult and belated, substantially increasing mortality in affected patients. Its early identification allows for us to choose the most appropriate therapies in the shortest time, improving patients' outcomes and eventually their survival. Since neutrophil activation is an indicator of an early innate immune response, the aim of the study was to evaluate the role of Neutrophil-Reactive Intensity (NEUT-RI), which is an indicator of their metabolic activity, in the diagnosis of sepsis. Data from 96 patients consecutively admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) were retrospectively analyzed (46 patients with and 50 without sepsis). Patients with sepsis were further divided between sepsis and septic shock according to the severity of the illness. Patients were subsequently classified according to renal function. For the diagnosis of sepsis, NEUT-RI showed an AUC of >0.80 and a better negative predictive value than Procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) (87.4% vs. 83.9% and 86.6%, = 0.038). Unlike PCT and CRP, NEUT-RI did not show a significant difference within the "septic" group between patients with normal renal function and those with renal failure ( = 0.739). Similar results were observed among the "non-septic" group ( = 0.182). The increase in NEUT-RI values could be useful in the early ruling-out of sepsis, and it does not appear to be influenced by renal failure. However, NEUT-RI has not proved to be efficient in discriminating the severity of sepsis at the time of admission. Larger, prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.

Citing Articles

New Neutrophil Parameters in Diseases with Various Inflammatory Processes.

Rutkowska E, Kwiecien I, Raniszewska A, Sokolowski R, Bednarek J, Jahnz-Rozyk K Biomedicines. 2024; 12(9).

PMID: 39335529 PMC: 11429323. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12092016.


Presepsin in Critical Illness: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives.

Formenti P, Gotti M, Palmieri F, Pastori S, Roccaforte V, Menozzi A Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(12).

PMID: 38928726 PMC: 11202475. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14121311.


A Secondary Retrospective Analysis of the Predictive Value of Neutrophil-Reactive Intensity (NEUT-RI) in Septic and Non-Septic Patients in Intensive Care.

Formenti P, Isidori L, Pastori S, Roccaforte V, Mantovani E, Iezzi M Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(8).

PMID: 38667467 PMC: 11049356. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14080821.

References
1.
Li X, Liu C, Wang X, Mao Z, Yi H, Zhou F . Comparison of Two Predictive Models of Sepsis in Critically Ill Patients Based on the Combined Use of Inflammatory Markers. Int J Gen Med. 2022; 15:1013-1022. PMC: 8818968. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S348797. View

2.
Mandrekar J . Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment. J Thorac Oncol. 2010; 5(9):1315-6. DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181ec173d. View

3.
Kim H, Hur M, Choi S, Moon H, Yun Y, Hwang H . Performance evaluation of Sysmex XN hematology analyzer in umbilical cord blood: a comparison study with Sysmex XE-2100. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2014; 52(12):1771-9. DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2014-0392. View

4.
Schmitz R, Keller P, Baier M, Hagel S, Pletz M, Brunkhorst F . Quality of blood culture testing - a survey in intensive care units and microbiological laboratories across four European countries. Crit Care. 2013; 17(5):R248. PMC: 4056044. DOI: 10.1186/cc13074. View

5.
Haaksma M, Smit J, Boussuges A, Demoule A, Dres M, Ferrari G . EXpert consensus On Diaphragm UltraSonography in the critically ill (EXODUS): a Delphi consensus statement on the measurement of diaphragm ultrasound-derived parameters in a critical care setting. Crit Care. 2022; 26(1):99. PMC: 8991486. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-03975-5. View