» Articles » PMID: 37237711

Compliance with Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Obstetric and Gynecological Surgeries in Two Peruvian Hospitals

Abstract

Introduction: Surgical site infections (SSI) can be as high in gynecology and obstetrics surgeries compared to other areas. Antimicrobial prophylaxis is an effective tool in the prevention of SSIs; however, it is often not adequately administered, so this study aimed to understand the compliance and factors associated with the use of the clinical practice guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis in gynecological surgeries in two hospitals in the city of Huanuco, Peru.

Methods: An analytical cross-sectional study of all gynecologic surgeries performed during 2019 was performed. Compliance was determined based on the antibiotic chosen, dose, administration time, redosing, and prophylaxis duration. Age, hospital of origin, presence of comorbidities, surgery performed, as well as its duration, types of surgery, and anesthesia were considered as related factors.

Results: We collected 529 medical records of patients undergoing gynecological surgery with a median age of 33 years. The prophylactic antibiotic was correctly indicated in 55.5% of cases, and the dose was correct in 31.2%. Total compliance with the five variables evaluated was only 3.9%. Cefazolin was the most commonly used antibiotic.

Conclusion: Low compliance with the institutional clinical practice guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis was identified, showing that antimicrobial prophylaxis in the hospitals studied was inadequate.

Citing Articles

Synthesizing evidence to guide the design and implementation of effective strategies for discontinuing postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical settings: an umbrella review post-WHO 2018 recommendations.

Bwire G, Magati R, Ntissi H, Mbilinyi T, Manguzu M, Nyondo G Syst Rev. 2025; 14(1):7.

PMID: 39780234 PMC: 11708070. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02750-7.


Point prevalence of evidence-based antimicrobial use among hospitalized patients in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Boltena M, Wolde M, Hailu B, El-Khatib Z, Steck V, Woldegerima S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):12652.

PMID: 38825623 PMC: 11144712. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-62651-6.


Antibiotic prophylaxis compliance differences in surgery and gynecology/obstetrics services in Huánuco, Peru.

Panduro-Correa V, Gomez-Gonzales W, Rabaan A, Valencia-Martinez J, Gutierrez-Acuna Y, Chihuantito-Abal L Infez Med. 2023; 31(3):364-373.

PMID: 37701388 PMC: 10495055. DOI: 10.53854/liim-3103-10.

References
1.
Abdel Jalil M, Hammour K, Alsous M, Hadadden R, Awad W, Bakri F . Noncompliance with surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines: A Jordanian experience in cesarean deliveries. Am J Infect Control. 2017; 46(1):14-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.06.033. View

2.
Uppendahl L, Chiles C, Shields S, Dong F, Kraft E, Duong J . Appropriate Use of Prophylactic Antibiotic Agents in Gynecologic Surgeries at a Midwestern Teaching Hospital. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018; 19(4):397-402. DOI: 10.1089/sur.2017.247. View

3.
Puri M, Nain S, Gautam A, Chaudhary V, Jaiswal N, Gs T . Rational use of antibiotics for major elective gynaecological and obstetrical surgical procedures: quality improvement journey from a tertiary care public facility. BMJ Open Qual. 2022; 11(Suppl 1). PMC: 9092174. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001438. View

4.
Al-Azzam S, Alzoubi K, Mhaidat N, Haddadin R, Masadeh M, Tumah H . Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis practice and guideline adherence in Jordan: a multi-centre study in Jordanian hospitals. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2012; 6(10):715-20. DOI: 10.3855/jidc.1676. View

5.
Gupta N . Antimicrobial therapy in resource-limited settings with high antimicrobial resistance: a case-based approach. Infez Med. 2022; 30(1):73-79. PMC: 8929731. DOI: 10.53854/liim-3001-8. View